Lucid Diagnostics 株価情報 (NASDAQ: LUCD)

最新ニュース Lucid Diagnostics (NASDAQ:LUCD) 株価情報

LUCID DIAGNOSTICS INC

Lucid Diagnostics

Lucid Diagnostics Inc is a commercial-stage medical diagnostics technology company focused on the millions of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), also known as chronic heartburn, acid reflux, or simply reflux, who are at risk of developing esophageal precancer and cancer, specifically lethal esophageal adenocarcinoma. Its products include EsoCheck and EsoGuard.

Lucid Diagnostics Inc

U.S. Steel Corp. (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/X#NYSE">X</a>) shares rallied Monday after President Donald Trump approved the company&#8217;s takeover by Japan's Nippon Steel. 
The deal faced opposition and multiple reviews. It&#8217;s now clear to close after both firms committed to a series of measures designed to <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/markets/equities/25/06/45938248/trump-approves-nippon-steels-14-9-billion-bid-for-us-steel">protect U.S. interests.</a>
Read Next:<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/news/retail-sales/25/06/45953480/alibaba-pdd-stocks-climb-chinas-retail-sector-gains-despite-us-tariffs?utm_source=articleShare"> Alibaba, PDD Stocks Climb As China&#8217;s Retail Sector Gains Despite US Tariffs</a>
The Details: President Trump signed an executive order approving the merger after both companies agreed to a national security arrangement with the U.S. government, per <a href="https://www.cnbc.com/2025/06/16/us-steel-rallies-as-trump-approves-nippon-takeover.html">CNBC</a>.
The agreement includes provisions such as a "golden share" for the U.S. government, giving it special oversight powers over the company's operations. 
Both companies also stated that the deal would allow U.S. Steel to operate as a wholly owned subsidiary of Nippon North America, while maintaining commitments to domestic manufacturing and governance. 
"All regulatory approvals required for the completion of the Transaction have been received," U.S. Steel said in an SEC filing on Monday. "The Transaction remains subject to the satisfaction of customary closing conditions, and is expected to be completed promptly."
Why It Matters: The approval of Nippon's acquisition of U.S. Steel represents a major change for the industry. In early January, then-President Joe Biden <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/trading-ideas/movers/25/01/42787508/biden-blocks-14-9b-us-steel-takeover-shares-plunge">blocked the deal</a>, citing foreign ownership would threaten national security and <a href="https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2025/01/03/statement-from-president-joe-biden-13/#:~:text=As%20I%20have%20said%20many,critical%20for%20resilient%20supply%20chains" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">undermine critical supply chains</a>.
Trump returned to office and also opposed the deal over security concerns.
To secure the deal, Nippon Steel committed to investing $14 billion, including up to $4 billion for a new mill. The investment was part of a broader strategy to address the Trump administration's concerns and gain approval.
Additionally, Trump doubled tariffs <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/trading-ideas/movers/25/06/45873964/steel-stocks-slide-on-potential-us-mexico-tariff-deal-report">on imported steel </a>to 50% to protect domestic jobs, while supporting the sale of U.S. Steel to Nippon, in order to help revitalize the U.S. steel industry.
Read Next:&nbsp;
<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/trading-ideas/movers/25/06/45851086/these-are-the-3-hottest-stock-market-themes-trending-now?utm_source=articleShare">These Are The 3 Hottest Stock Market Themes Trending Now</a></li>
</ul>
Image: Shutterstock

News

Global

Movers

Trading Ideas

US Steel Stock Rallies After Trump Approves Nippon Steel Deal

Spyre Therapeutics, Inc. (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/SYRE#NASDAQ">SYRE</a>), a clinical-stage biotechnology company advancing best-in-class antibody engineering, dose optimization, and rational therapeutic combinations for the treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Disease ("IBD") and other immune-mediated diseases, today announced it will report interim results from the Phase 1 SPY002 healthy volunteer trials on Tuesday, June 17, 2025. Following the announcement, the Company will host a conference call and webcast at 8:00am ET to discuss the results.

Biotech

General

SYRE

Spyre Therapeutics To Announce Interim Phase 1 SPY002 Trial Results For IBD On June 17, 2025, With Conference Call And Webcast At 8:00am ET

Earnings

STRM

Streamline Health Solns Q1 EPS $(0.40) Up From $(0.75) YoY, Sales $4.81M Up From $4.33M YoY

Globus Maritime (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/GLBS#NASDAQ">GLBS</a>) reported quarterly losses of $(0.07) per share which missed the analyst consensus estimate of $(0.03) by 133.33 percent. This is a 600 percent decrease over losses of $(0.01) per share from the same period last year. The company reported quarterly sales of $8.60 million which missed the analyst consensus estimate of $12.00 million by 28.33 percent. This is a 11.50 percent increase over sales of $7.71 million the same period last year.

Earnings Misses

GLBS

Globus Maritime Q1 EPS $(0.07) Misses $(0.03) Estimate, Sales $8.60M Miss $12.00M Estimate

Southwest Gas Holdings, Inc.&nbsp;(NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/SWX#NYSE">SWX</a>) ("Southwest Gas Holdings" or the "Company") today announced the commencement of an underwritten secondary public offering of&nbsp;Centuri Holdings, Inc.&nbsp;(NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/CTRI#NYSE">CTRI</a>) ("Centuri") common stock (the "Offering"), pursuant to which&nbsp;Southwest Gas Holdings, as the selling stockholder, is offering 9,500,000 existing shares of Centuri's common stock.&nbsp;Southwest Gas Holdings&nbsp;expects to grant the underwriters a 30-day option to purchase up to an additional 1,425,000 shares of Centuri's common stock.

Offerings

CTRI

Southwest Gas Holdings Launches Secondary Offering Of 9.5M Centuri Shares

WIIM

SLRX

Salarius Pharmaceuticals shares are trading higher after the company disclosed it received an extension from the Nasdaq to regain compliance.

Nasdaq Grants Salarius Pharmaceuticals Extension To Regain Compliance

Digital Turbine (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/APPS#NASDAQ">APPS</a>) sees FY2026 sales of $515.000 million-$525.000 million vs $519.64 million analyst estimate.

Guidance

APPS

Digital Turbine Sees FY2026 Sales $515.000M-$525.000M vs $519.64M Est

Zeo Energy (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/ZEO#NASDAQ">ZEO</a>) reported quarterly losses of $(0.48) per share. This is a 68.83 percent increase over losses of $(1.54) per share from the same period last year. The company reported $8.78 million in sales this quarter. This is a 56.39 percent decrease over sales of $20.14 million the same period last year.

Zeo Energy Q1 EPS $(0.48) Up From $(1.54) YoY, Sales $8.78M Down From $20.14M YoY

Digital Turbine (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/APPS#NASDAQ">APPS</a>) reported quarterly earnings of $0.10 per share which beat the analyst consensus estimate of $0.04 by 150 percent. This is a 16.67 percent decrease over earnings of $0.12 per share from the same period last year. The company reported quarterly sales of $119.15 million which beat the analyst consensus estimate of $116.64 million by 2.16 percent. This is a 6.17 percent increase over sales of $112.22 million the same period last year.

Earnings Beats

Digital Turbine Q4 Adj. EPS $0.10 Beats $0.04 Estimate, Sales $119.15M Beat $116.64M Estimate

RF Industries (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/RFIL#NASDAQ">RFIL</a>) reported quarterly earnings of $0.07 per share which beat the analyst consensus estimate of $0.04 by 75 percent. This is a 600 percent increase over earnings of $0.01 per share from the same period last year. The company reported quarterly sales of $18.90 million which beat the analyst consensus estimate of $17.24 million by 9.64 percent. This is a 17.32 percent increase over sales of $16.11 million the same period last year.

RFIL

RF Industries Q2 Adj. EPS $0.07 Beats $0.04 Estimate, Sales $18.90M Beat $17.24M Estimate

High Tide (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/HITI#NASDAQ">HITI</a>) reported quarterly losses of $(0.03) per share which missed the analyst consensus estimate of $(0.02) by 40 percent. The company reported quarterly sales of $96.94 million which beat the analyst consensus estimate of $96.73 million by 0.22 percent. This is a 5.83 percent increase over sales of $91.60 million the same period last year.

HITI

High Tide Q2 EPS $(0.03) Misses $(0.02) Estimate, Sales $96.94M Beat $96.73M Estimate

U.S. Treasury yields climbed sharply Monday after a 20-year bond auction showed signs of weakening foreign demand. This bolstered concerns over America's fiscal outlook and tested the market's tolerance for a 5% <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/markets/bonds">long-term yield threshold.</a>
The spike in yields took place after 12:00 p.m. ET, with the 30-year Treasury yield rising 4 basis points to 4.96%, approaching the psychologically important 5% mark. The benchmark 10-year yield also rose 4 basis points to 4.45%.
<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="527" src="https://editorial-assets.benzinga.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/16152055/image-247-1024x527.png" alt="" class="wp-image-951297" srcset="https://editorial-assets.benzinga.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/16152055/image-247-1024x527.png 1024w,https://editorial-assets.benzinga.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/16152055/image-247-300x154.png 300w,https://editorial-assets.benzinga.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/16152055/image-247-768x395.png 768w,https://editorial-assets.benzinga.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/16152055/image-247-1536x790.png 1536w,https://editorial-assets.benzinga.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/16152055/image-247-2048x1053.png 2048w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /></figure>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">20-Year Auction Triggers Yield Surge</h2>
Exante Data noted that Monday's 20-year bond auction showed a mixed picture of demand. 
The U.S. Treasury sold $14.3 billion in bonds at a high yield of 4.94%, with a bid-to-cover ratio of 2.68—landing in the top quartile of the last 50 auctions, suggesting solid headline interest. 
Primary dealers, who are required to take unsold debt, purchased 13.4%—in line with historical averages. 
Direct bidders, including mutual funds and hedge funds, made up 19.9% of demand, also in the top quartile. 
But indirect bidders, a group largely made up of foreign institutions, took just 66.7%—a level only slightly above the bottom quartile, pointing to weaker-than-usual foreign appetite.
<figure class="wp-block-embed is-type-rich is-provider-twitter wp-block-embed-twitter"> 
<div class="wp-block-embed__wrapper">
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">20-Year Bond Auction Summary Today (Jun 16, 2025), the US Treasury auctioned a 20-Year bond for $14.3bn at a High Yield of 4.94%, recording a Bid to Cover of 2.68. In the chart below we summarize other auction metrics. <a href="https://t.co/fTi7kAL5UG">pic.twitter.com/fTi7kAL5UG</a>
&mdash; Exante Data (@ExanteData) <a href="https://twitter.com/ExanteData/status/1934658822980706357?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 16, 2025</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></div>
</figure>
The yield move rattled bond proxies. The iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/TLT#NASDAQ">TLT</a>) declined 1% on the day, as longer-duration bonds remain highly sensitive to rate moves.
This yield spike follows a broader trend of tightening financial conditions, raising questions about whether higher yields could derail the ongoing stock market rally.
<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Does The 5% Yield Threaten Stocks?</h3>
In a report this month, Goldman Sachs analysts indicated that fears around the 5% threshold for long-term Treasury <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/markets/treasuries/25/06/45798569/think-5-yields-will-crush-stock-market-goldman-sachs-says-think-again">yields are largely overblown. </a>
While investors often compare Treasury yields to the S&amp;P 500's earnings yield—now also hovering around 5%—Goldman says this &#8220;parity logic&#8221; misrepresents the historical relationship.
"Because equities are tied to nominal earnings, we believe the inflation-adjusted real Treasury yield is a more appropriate comparator," Goldman said.
Historical data supports this view: when 10-year yields ranged from 5% to 6%, U.S. equities still delivered a median annual total return of 16%. Even during periods when yields exceeded 8%, stock returns averaged 19%.
Read Next:
<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/markets/economic-data/25/06/45954142/retail-sales-face-key-tariff-test-how-could-markets-react-to-weaker-spending">Retail Sales Face Key Tariff Test: How Could Markets React To Weaker Spending? </a></li>
</ul>
Photo: Shutterstock

Equities

Large Cap

Bonds

Broad U.S. Equity ETFs

Treasuries

Econ #s

Tech

ETFs

iShares Trust Barclays 20+ Year Treasury Bond Fund

Treasury Yields Near 5% After Soft Foreign Demand: A Red Flag For Stocks?

<a href="https://www.wsj.com/tech/ai/openai-and-microsoft-tensions-are-reaching-a-boiling-point-4981c44f" title="https://www.wsj.com/tech/ai/openai-and-microsoft-tensions-are-reaching-a-boiling-point-4981c44f">https://www.wsj.com/tech/ai/openai-and-microsoft-tensions-are-reaching-a-boiling-point-4981c44f</a>

MSFT

'OpenAI and Microsoft Tensions Are Reaching a Boiling Point' - WSJ

It's no secret that artificial intelligence has been one of the hottest (if not the hottest) sectors in the market. Primarily, positive sentiment has surged for "frontline" enterprises, particularly semiconductor firms specializing in high-performance computing chips. Largely overlooked in the enthusiasm is Unity Software Inc (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/U#NYSE">U</a>). Known for its video game software development, it may be time for investors to have a rethink about the company's forward prospects.
While U stock may be a gaming-centric investment, that doesn't necessarily mean that it's not a viable AI play. Quite the opposite, the underlying industry increasingly utilizes machine intelligence to foster greater productivity. Earlier this year, Unity, in its press <a href="https://investors.unity.com/news/news-details/2025/Unity-Announces-Enhanced-Engine-Performance-and-Stability-New-Platforms-and-AI-Powered-Workflows-at-GDC-2025/default.aspx">release</a>, announced enhanced performance and stability for its development platform, along with new AI-powered workflows. In particular, the associated tools should accelerate workflows through automation of complex and repetitive tasks.
What's more, the gaming industry is incredibly receptive to the marriage of software development and machine intelligence. According to Unity's market <a href="https://venturebeat.com/games/how-unity-plans-to-bring-ai-and-other-updates-into-its-unity-6-game-engine-matt-bromberg-interview/">research</a>, developer optimism about AI is growing, with 96% of developers integrating the innovation into their workflows. Essentially, the technology allows software teams to punch above their weight thanks to the productivity boost.
Even better, Unity could be an <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/content/45868487/why-unity-software-may-be-the-ai-breakout-no-one-saw-coming">underappreciated AI investment</a> for its wide-ranging applications. Notably, Air France-KLM (OTC:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/AFLYY#OTC">AFLYY</a>) subsidiary KLM utilizes Unity's services to develop a 3D cockpit training program for its pilots. Germany's national railway company, Deutsche Bahn, also incorporates Unity's <a href="https://unity.com/resources/unite-ies-2024-deutsche-bahn-railway-transportation-xr">platform</a> to develop training and operating models. It's more than likely that additional companies will continue to integrate AI into their operations, thus providing a tailwind for U stock.
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Statistical Winds Flow Favorably For U Stock</h2>
To be fair, while the narrative for U stock appears bullish, it's also a well-known argument — something that's been in the public domain for months. From an investment perspective, these storylines answer the "why" regarding potential interest. However, from a trading perspective, the focus is more centered on "why now?"
It's an important inquiry, particularly for options traders. Since all options expire, the underlying position must not only hit profitability thresholds in terms of magnitude (y-axis); it must also do so within the prescribed time period (x-axis). In other words, while options are attractive for the leverage they provide, they also present the threat of full principal loss (or worse) if the trade goes sour.
As such, traders live in the world of probabilities. Still, it's important to refine this categorization. For most practical applications, two types of probabilities exist: derivative and conditional. Arguably, in the financial realm, investors are more likely to see the former variety, which calculates odds of a certain outcome materializing across the entire dataset's distribution. The latter approach represents a similar calculation but focuses on a specific subset of the data.
To use a baseball analogy, derivative probabilities represent a player's batting average over a full season. Conditional probabilities are equivalent to a player's batting average when there are runners in scoring position (RISP). This is much more situationally relevant for the options trader.
However, in order to apply conditional probabilities, the measurement metric must be consistent across the entire dataset to facilitate the "if-then" implication logic. That's why market breadth sequences — or the sequences of accumulative and distributive sessions — are invaluable for statistical analysis.
<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="576" src="https://editorial-assets.benzinga.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/16151319/U-stock-10wk-forecast-1024x576.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-951293" srcset="https://editorial-assets.benzinga.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/16151319/U-stock-10wk-forecast-1024x576.jpg 1024w,https://editorial-assets.benzinga.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/16151319/U-stock-10wk-forecast-300x169.jpg 300w,https://editorial-assets.benzinga.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/16151319/U-stock-10wk-forecast-768x432.jpg 768w,https://editorial-assets.benzinga.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/16151319/U-stock-10wk-forecast.jpg 1280w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">Image by author</figcaption></figure>
Specific to U stock, in the past two months, the equity printed a "4-6-U" sequence: four up weeks, six down weeks, with a net positive trajectory across the 10-week period. Notably, in 61.54% of cases, the following week's price action results in upside, with a median return of 7.79%.
With Unity stock closing at $23.66 on Friday, it could theoretically be on course to breach $25.50 in short order, perhaps in a week or two. Should the bulls maintain control of the market, historical trends imply a push toward $26 within two or three weeks.
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">A Tempting Proposition On Tap</h2>
For traders intrigued at the statistical setup, they may consider the 24.50/25.50 bull call spread expiring July 11. This transaction involves buying the $24.50 call and simultaneously selling the $25.50 call, for a net debit paid of $43. Should U stock rise through the short strike price ($25.50) at expiration, the maximum reward is $57, a payout of over 132%. Also, the breakeven price at time of writing is $24.93.
Mainly, what makes this trade tempting is the implied shift in sentiment regime. As a baseline, the chance that a long position in Unity stock will be profitable over any given week is 46.77%. However, the 4-6-U sequence — to extend the baseball analogy — creates a favorable matchup. If this were a ballgame, the manager would give the go-ahead for the batter to swing.
Much like baseball's sabermetrics, traders can use conditional probabilities — the batting average with RISP — to make smarter transactions. Of course, this doesn't guarantee success. However, it's a far superior approach to interpreting tealeaves.
The opinions and views expressed in this content are those of the individual author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Benzinga. Benzinga is not responsible for the accuracy or reliability of any information provided herein. This content is for informational purposes only and should not be misconstrued as investment advice or a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Readers are asked not to rely on the opinions or information herein, and encouraged to do their own due diligence before making investing decisions.
Read Next:
<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/markets/equities/25/06/45933826/qubt-stock-hype-data-flashes-caution">Options Corner: Quantum Computing Runs On Hype But The Data Flashes Caution</a></li>
</ul>
Photo: Shutterstock

Long Ideas

Options

AFLYY

Options Corner: Hidden AI Play Unity Software Also Enjoys A Statistical Edge

Vital Energy (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/VTLE#NYSE">VTLE</a>) has been analyzed by 8 analysts in the last three months, revealing a diverse range of perspectives from bullish to bearish.
The following table provides a quick overview of their recent ratings, highlighting the changing sentiments over the past 30 days and comparing them to the preceding months.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th></th>
<th align="right">Bullish</th>
<th align="right">Somewhat Bullish</th>
<th align="right">Indifferent</th>
<th align="right">Somewhat Bearish</th>
<th align="right">Bearish</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Total Ratings</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">7</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Last 30D</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1M Ago</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2M Ago</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">4</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>3M Ago</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">2</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
In the assessment of 12-month price targets, analysts unveil insights for Vital Energy, presenting an average target of $20.75, a high estimate of $27.00, and a low estimate of $15.00. A 24.87% drop is evident in the current average compared to the previous average price target of $27.62. 
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1750104066_0.png" alt="price target chart" />
<h2>Investigating Analyst Ratings: An Elaborate Study</h2>
The analysis of recent analyst actions sheds light on the perception of Vital Energy by financial experts. The following summary presents key analysts, their recent evaluations, and adjustments to ratings and price targets.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Analyst</th>
<th>Analyst Firm</th>
<th>Action Taken</th>
<th>Rating</th>
<th>Current Price Target</th>
<th>Prior Price Target</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Hanwen Chang</td>
<td>Wells Fargo</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Equal-Weight</td>
<td>$21.00</td>
<td>$24.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Mark Lear</td>
<td>Piper Sandler</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Neutral</td>
<td>$15.00</td>
<td>$16.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Mark Lear</td>
<td>Piper Sandler</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Neutral</td>
<td>$16.00</td>
<td>$23.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Nitin Kumar</td>
<td>Mizuho</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Neutral</td>
<td>$23.00</td>
<td>$29.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Mark Lear</td>
<td>Piper Sandler</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Neutral</td>
<td>$23.00</td>
<td>$24.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Paul Diamond</td>
<td>Citigroup</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Neutral</td>
<td>$17.00</td>
<td>$36.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Noah Hungness</td>
<td>B of A Securities</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Underperform</td>
<td>$27.00</td>
<td>$33.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Hanwen Chang</td>
<td>Wells Fargo</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Equal-Weight</td>
<td>$24.00</td>
<td>$36.00</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h3>Key Insights:</h3>
<ul>
<li>Action Taken: Analysts adapt their recommendations to changing market conditions and company performance. Whether they 'Maintain', 'Raise' or 'Lower' their stance, it reflects their response to recent developments related to Vital Energy. This information provides a snapshot of how analysts perceive the current state of the company.</li>
<li>Rating: Delving into assessments, analysts assign qualitative values, from 'Outperform' to 'Underperform'. These ratings communicate expectations for the relative performance of Vital Energy compared to the broader market.</li>
<li>Price Targets: Analysts navigate through adjustments in price targets, providing estimates for Vital Energy's future value. Comparing current and prior targets offers insights into analysts' evolving expectations.</li>
</ul>
To gain a panoramic view of Vital Energy's market performance, explore these analyst evaluations alongside essential financial indicators. Stay informed and make judicious decisions using our Ratings Table.
<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/VTLE/analyst-ratings?adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=analyst-ratings&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantage">Stay up to date on Vital Energy analyst ratings.</a>
If you are interested in following small-cap stock news and performance <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/news/small-cap?adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=analyst-ratings&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantage">you can start by tracking it here</a>.
<h2>Unveiling the Story Behind Vital Energy</h2>
Vital Energy is an independent energy company. Its business is focused on the acquisition, exploration, and development of oil and natural gas properties in the Permian Basin of West Texas. The Company has identified one operating segment: exploration and production.
<h3>Financial Insights: Vital Energy</h3>
Market Capitalization: Indicating a reduced size compared to industry averages, the company's market capitalization poses unique challenges.
Positive Revenue Trend: Examining Vital Energy's financials over 3M reveals a positive narrative. The company achieved a noteworthy revenue growth rate of 6.19% as of 31 March, 2025, showcasing a substantial increase in top-line earnings. As compared to competitors, the company encountered difficulties, with a growth rate lower than the average among peers in the Energy sector.
Net Margin: The company's net margin is below industry benchmarks, signaling potential difficulties in achieving strong profitability. With a net margin of -3.68%, the company may need to address challenges in effective cost control.
Return on Equity (ROE): The company's ROE is below industry benchmarks, signaling potential difficulties in efficiently using equity capital. With an ROE of -0.7%, the company may need to address challenges in generating satisfactory returns for shareholders.
Return on Assets (ROA): Vital Energy's ROA falls below industry averages, indicating challenges in efficiently utilizing assets. With an ROA of -0.33%, the company may face hurdles in generating optimal returns from its assets.
Debt Management: With a high debt-to-equity ratio of 0.9, Vital Energy faces challenges in effectively managing its debt levels, indicating potential financial strain.
<h2>The Basics of Analyst Ratings</h2>
Within the domain of banking and financial systems, analysts specialize in reporting for specific stocks or defined sectors. Their work involves attending company conference calls and meetings, researching company financial statements, and communicating with insiders to publish "analyst ratings" for stocks. Analysts typically assess and rate each stock once per quarter.
In addition to their assessments, some analysts extend their insights by offering predictions for key metrics such as earnings, revenue, and growth estimates. This supplementary information provides further guidance for traders. It is crucial to recognize that, despite their specialization, analysts are human and can only provide forecasts based on their beliefs.
Which Stocks Are Analysts Recommending Now?
Benzinga Edge gives you instant access to all major analyst upgrades, downgrades, and price targets. Sort by accuracy, upside potential, and more. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/premium/ideas/benzinga-edge-checkout/?t=be8be9arja3be22bz21&amp;adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=analyst-ratings&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantage">Click here to stay ahead of the market</a>.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

Analyst Ratings

VTLE

Deep Dive Into Vital Energy Stock: Analyst Perspectives (8 Ratings)

During the last three months, 15 analysts shared their evaluations of Cisco Systems (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/CSCO#NASDAQ">CSCO</a>), revealing diverse outlooks from bullish to bearish.
The following table provides a quick overview of their recent ratings, highlighting the changing sentiments over the past 30 days and comparing them to the preceding months.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th></th>
<th align="right">Bullish</th>
<th align="right">Somewhat Bullish</th>
<th align="right">Indifferent</th>
<th align="right">Somewhat Bearish</th>
<th align="right">Bearish</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Total Ratings</td>
<td align="right">5</td>
<td align="right">7</td>
<td align="right">3</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Last 30D</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1M Ago</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2M Ago</td>
<td align="right">3</td>
<td align="right">6</td>
<td align="right">2</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>3M Ago</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
Analysts have set 12-month price targets for Cisco Systems, revealing an average target of $68.53, a high estimate of $75.00, and a low estimate of $60.00. Experiencing a 0.39% decline, the current average is now lower than the previous average price target of $68.80. 
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1750104058_0.png" alt="price target chart" />
<h2>Exploring Analyst Ratings: An In-Depth Overview</h2>
The analysis of recent analyst actions sheds light on the perception of Cisco Systems by financial experts. The following summary presents key analysts, their recent evaluations, and adjustments to ratings and price targets.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Analyst</th>
<th>Analyst Firm</th>
<th>Action Taken</th>
<th>Rating</th>
<th>Current Price Target</th>
<th>Prior Price Target</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Matthew Niknam</td>
<td>Deutsche Bank</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$73.00</td>
<td>$65.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Amit Daryanani</td>
<td>Evercore ISI Group</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Outperform</td>
<td>$72.00</td>
<td>$67.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>James Fish</td>
<td>Piper Sandler</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Neutral</td>
<td>$64.00</td>
<td>$60.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Atif Malik</td>
<td>Citigroup</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$71.00</td>
<td>$68.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Meta Marshall</td>
<td>Morgan Stanley</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Overweight</td>
<td>$67.00</td>
<td>$65.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Tim Long</td>
<td>Barclays</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Equal-Weight</td>
<td>$66.00</td>
<td>$61.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Samik Chatterjee</td>
<td>JP Morgan</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Overweight</td>
<td>$73.00</td>
<td>$70.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Mike Genovese</td>
<td>Rosenblatt</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$74.00</td>
<td>$63.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Aaron Rakers</td>
<td>Wells Fargo</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Overweight</td>
<td>$75.00</td>
<td>$72.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Amit Daryanani</td>
<td>Evercore ISI Group</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Outperform</td>
<td>$67.00</td>
<td>$75.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Mike Genovese</td>
<td>Rosenblatt</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$63.00</td>
<td>$80.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Samik Chatterjee</td>
<td>JP Morgan</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Overweight</td>
<td>$70.00</td>
<td>$73.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Atif Malik</td>
<td>Citigroup</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$68.00</td>
<td>$73.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Meta Marshall</td>
<td>Morgan Stanley</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Overweight</td>
<td>$65.00</td>
<td>$68.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>James Fish</td>
<td>Piper Sandler</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Neutral</td>
<td>$60.00</td>
<td>$72.00</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h3>Key Insights:</h3>
<ul>
<li>Action Taken: Analysts respond to changes in market conditions and company performance, frequently updating their recommendations. Whether they 'Maintain', 'Raise' or 'Lower' their stance, it reflects their reaction to recent developments related to Cisco Systems. This information offers a snapshot of how analysts perceive the current state of the company.</li>
<li>Rating: Gaining insights, analysts provide qualitative assessments, ranging from 'Outperform' to 'Underperform'. These ratings reflect expectations for the relative performance of Cisco Systems compared to the broader market.</li>
<li>Price Targets: Understanding forecasts, analysts offer estimates for Cisco Systems's future value. Examining the current and prior targets provides insight into analysts' changing expectations.</li>
</ul>
For valuable insights into Cisco Systems's market performance, consider these analyst evaluations alongside crucial financial indicators. Stay well-informed and make prudent decisions using our Ratings Table.
<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/CSCO/analyst-ratings?adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=analyst-ratings&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantage">Stay up to date on Cisco Systems analyst ratings.</a>
<h2>All You Need to Know About Cisco Systems</h2>
Cisco Systems is the largest provider of networking equipment in the world and one of the largest software companies in the world. Its largest businesses are selling networking hardware and software (where it has leading market shares) and cybersecurity software such as firewalls. It also has collaboration products, like its Webex suite, and observability tools. It primarily outsources its manufacturing to third parties and has a large sales and marketing staff—25,000 strong across 90 countries. Overall, Cisco employs 80,000 people and sells its products globally.
<h3>Understanding the Numbers: Cisco Systems's Finances</h3>
Market Capitalization: Boasting an elevated market capitalization, the company surpasses industry averages. This signals substantial size and strong market recognition.
Positive Revenue Trend: Examining Cisco Systems's financials over 3M reveals a positive narrative. The company achieved a noteworthy revenue growth rate of 11.39% as of 30 April, 2025, showcasing a substantial increase in top-line earnings. In comparison to its industry peers, the company trails behind with a growth rate lower than the average among peers in the Information Technology sector.
Net Margin: Cisco Systems's net margin surpasses industry standards, highlighting the company's exceptional financial performance. With an impressive 17.61% net margin, the company effectively manages costs and achieves strong profitability.
Return on Equity (ROE): Cisco Systems's ROE surpasses industry standards, highlighting the company's exceptional financial performance. With an impressive 5.45% ROE, the company effectively utilizes shareholder equity capital.
Return on Assets (ROA): Cisco Systems's financial strength is reflected in its exceptional ROA, which exceeds industry averages. With a remarkable ROA of 2.07%, the company showcases efficient use of assets and strong financial health.
Debt Management: Cisco Systems's debt-to-equity ratio is below industry norms, indicating a sound financial structure with a ratio of 0.64.
<h2>The Core of Analyst Ratings: What Every Investor Should Know</h2>
Analysts are specialists within banking and financial systems that typically report for specific stocks or within defined sectors. These people research company financial statements, sit in conference calls and meetings, and speak with relevant insiders to determine what are known as analyst ratings for stocks. Typically, analysts will rate each stock once a quarter. 
Some analysts will also offer forecasts for metrics like growth estimates, earnings, and revenue to provide further guidance on stocks. Investors who use analyst ratings should note that this specialized advice comes from humans and may be subject to error.
Which Stocks Are Analysts Recommending Now?
Benzinga Edge gives you instant access to all major analyst upgrades, downgrades, and price targets. Sort by accuracy, upside potential, and more. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/premium/ideas/benzinga-edge-checkout/?t=be8be9arja3be22bz21&amp;adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=analyst-ratings&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantage">Click here to stay ahead of the market</a>.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

CSCO

Cisco Systems Stock: A Deep Dive Into Analyst Perspectives (15 Ratings)

In the last three months, 7 analysts have published ratings on Antero Resources (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/AR#NYSE">AR</a>), offering a diverse range of perspectives from bullish to bearish.
The table below provides a snapshot of their recent ratings, showcasing how sentiments have evolved over the past 30 days and comparing them to the preceding months.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th></th>
<th align="right">Bullish</th>
<th align="right">Somewhat Bullish</th>
<th align="right">Indifferent</th>
<th align="right">Somewhat Bearish</th>
<th align="right">Bearish</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Total Ratings</td>
<td align="right">3</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">3</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Last 30D</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1M Ago</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2M Ago</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>3M Ago</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
Analysts have recently evaluated Antero Resources and provided 12-month price targets. The average target is $46.29, accompanied by a high estimate of $57.00 and a low estimate of $40.00. Marking an increase of 4.52%, the current average surpasses the previous average price target of $44.29. 
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1750104043_0.png" alt="price target chart" />
<h2>Decoding Analyst Ratings: A Detailed Look</h2>
The standing of Antero Resources among financial experts becomes clear with a thorough analysis of recent analyst actions. The summary below outlines key analysts, their recent evaluations, and adjustments to ratings and price targets.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Analyst</th>
<th>Analyst Firm</th>
<th>Action Taken</th>
<th>Rating</th>
<th>Current Price Target</th>
<th>Prior Price Target</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Roger Read</td>
<td>Wells Fargo</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Equal-Weight</td>
<td>$40.00</td>
<td>$42.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Kalei Akamine</td>
<td>B of A Securities</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$47.00</td>
<td>$44.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>John Freeman</td>
<td>Raymond James</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Strong Buy</td>
<td>$57.00</td>
<td>$56.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Nitin Kumar</td>
<td>Mizuho</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Outperform</td>
<td>$49.00</td>
<td>$47.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Josh Silverstein</td>
<td>UBS</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Neutral</td>
<td>$43.00</td>
<td>$41.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>David Deckelbaum</td>
<td>TD Cowen</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$46.00</td>
<td>$40.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Roger Read</td>
<td>Wells Fargo</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Equal-Weight</td>
<td>$42.00</td>
<td>$40.00</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h3>Key Insights:</h3>
<ul>
<li>Action Taken: Analysts respond to changes in market conditions and company performance, frequently updating their recommendations. Whether they 'Maintain', 'Raise' or 'Lower' their stance, it reflects their reaction to recent developments related to Antero Resources. This information offers a snapshot of how analysts perceive the current state of the company.</li>
<li>Rating: Delving into assessments, analysts assign qualitative values, from 'Outperform' to 'Underperform'. These ratings communicate expectations for the relative performance of Antero Resources compared to the broader market.</li>
<li>Price Targets: Analysts navigate through adjustments in price targets, providing estimates for Antero Resources's future value. Comparing current and prior targets offers insights into analysts' evolving expectations.</li>
</ul>
Assessing these analyst evaluations alongside crucial financial indicators can provide a comprehensive overview of Antero Resources's market position. Stay informed and make well-judged decisions with the assistance of our Ratings Table.
<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/AR/analyst-ratings?adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=analyst-ratings&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantage">Stay up to date on Antero Resources analyst ratings.</a>
<h2>Delving into Antero Resources's Background</h2>
Antero Resources, based in Denver, engages in the exploration for and production of natural gas and natural gas liquids in the United States and Canada. At the end of 2024, the company reported proven reserves of 17.9 trillion cubic feet of natural gas equivalent. Production averaged approximately 3,424 million cubic feet of equivalent a day in 2024 at a ratio of 35% liquids and 65% natural gas.
<h3>Financial Milestones: Antero Resources's Journey</h3>
Market Capitalization Analysis: Falling below industry benchmarks, the company's market capitalization reflects a reduced size compared to peers. This positioning may be influenced by factors such as growth expectations or operational capacity.
Positive Revenue Trend: Examining Antero Resources's financials over 3M reveals a positive narrative. The company achieved a noteworthy revenue growth rate of 31.68% as of 31 March, 2025, showcasing a substantial increase in top-line earnings. As compared to competitors, the company encountered difficulties, with a growth rate lower than the average among peers in the Energy sector.
Net Margin: The company's net margin is a standout performer, exceeding industry averages. With an impressive net margin of 14.93%, the company showcases strong profitability and effective cost control.
Return on Equity (ROE): Antero Resources's ROE surpasses industry standards, highlighting the company's exceptional financial performance. With an impressive 2.92% ROE, the company effectively utilizes shareholder equity capital.
Return on Assets (ROA): Antero Resources's ROA excels beyond industry benchmarks, reaching 1.6%. This signifies efficient management of assets and strong financial health.
Debt Management: Antero Resources's debt-to-equity ratio is below industry norms, indicating a sound financial structure with a ratio of 0.53.
<h2>Analyst Ratings: What Are They?</h2>
Experts in banking and financial systems, analysts specialize in reporting for specific stocks or defined sectors. Their comprehensive research involves attending company conference calls and meetings, analyzing financial statements, and engaging with insiders to generate what are known as analyst ratings for stocks. Typically, analysts assess and rate each stock once per quarter.
Some analysts also offer predictions for helpful metrics such as earnings, revenue, and growth estimates to provide further guidance as to what to do with certain tickers. It is important to keep in mind that while stock and sector analysts are specialists, they are also human and can only forecast their beliefs to traders.
Which Stocks Are Analysts Recommending Now?
Benzinga Edge gives you instant access to all major analyst upgrades, downgrades, and price targets. Sort by accuracy, upside potential, and more. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/premium/ideas/benzinga-edge-checkout/?t=be8be9arja3be22bz21&amp;adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=analyst-ratings&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantage">Click here to stay ahead of the market</a>.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

Forecasting The Future: 7 Analyst Projections For Antero Resources

Buybacks

FITB

Fifth Third Bancorp Announces 100M Share Repurchase Authorization

15 analysts have shared their evaluations of APA (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/APA#NASDAQ">APA</a>) during the recent three months, expressing a mix of bullish and bearish perspectives.
The table below provides a concise overview of recent ratings by analysts, offering insights into the changing sentiments over the past 30 days and drawing comparisons with the preceding months for a holistic perspective.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th></th>
<th align="right">Bullish</th>
<th align="right">Somewhat Bullish</th>
<th align="right">Indifferent</th>
<th align="right">Somewhat Bearish</th>
<th align="right">Bearish</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Total Ratings</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">2</td>
<td align="right">9</td>
<td align="right">4</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Last 30D</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1M Ago</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2M Ago</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">3</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>3M Ago</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">4</td>
<td align="right">2</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
In the assessment of 12-month price targets, analysts unveil insights for APA, presenting an average target of $20.73, a high estimate of $30.00, and a low estimate of $14.00. A 10.65% drop is evident in the current average compared to the previous average price target of $23.20. 
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1750104036_0.png" alt="price target chart" />
<h2>Investigating Analyst Ratings: An Elaborate Study</h2>
The standing of APA among financial experts becomes clear with a thorough analysis of recent analyst actions. The summary below outlines key analysts, their recent evaluations, and adjustments to ratings and price targets.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Analyst</th>
<th>Analyst Firm</th>
<th>Action Taken</th>
<th>Rating</th>
<th>Current Price Target</th>
<th>Prior Price Target</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Roger Read</td>
<td>Wells Fargo</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Equal-Weight</td>
<td>$20.00</td>
<td>$23.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>John Freeman</td>
<td>Raymond James</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Outperform</td>
<td>$25.00</td>
<td>$23.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Devin McDermott</td>
<td>Morgan Stanley</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Underweight</td>
<td>$21.00</td>
<td>$20.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Scott Gruber</td>
<td>Citigroup</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Neutral</td>
<td>$18.00</td>
<td>$15.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Mark Lear</td>
<td>Piper Sandler</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Neutral</td>
<td>$19.00</td>
<td>$22.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>William Janela</td>
<td>Mizuho</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Underperform</td>
<td>$19.00</td>
<td>$20.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Betty Jiang</td>
<td>Barclays</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Equal-Weight</td>
<td>$19.00</td>
<td>$25.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Mark Lear</td>
<td>Piper Sandler</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Neutral</td>
<td>$22.00</td>
<td>$23.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Biju Perincheril</td>
<td>Susquehanna</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Positive</td>
<td>$30.00</td>
<td>$31.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Scott Gruber</td>
<td>Citigroup</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Neutral</td>
<td>$15.00</td>
<td>$20.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Devin McDermott</td>
<td>Morgan Stanley</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Underweight</td>
<td>$20.00</td>
<td>$22.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Paul Cheng</td>
<td>Scotiabank</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Sector Perform</td>
<td>$14.00</td>
<td>$26.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Scott Hanold</td>
<td>RBC Capital</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Sector Perform</td>
<td>$24.00</td>
<td>$27.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Devin McDermott</td>
<td>Morgan Stanley</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Underweight</td>
<td>$22.00</td>
<td>$26.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Roger Read</td>
<td>Wells Fargo</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Equal-Weight</td>
<td>$23.00</td>
<td>$25.00</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h3>Key Insights:</h3>
<ul>
<li>Action Taken: Analysts adapt their recommendations to changing market conditions and company performance. Whether they 'Maintain', 'Raise' or 'Lower' their stance, it reflects their response to recent developments related to APA. This information provides a snapshot of how analysts perceive the current state of the company.</li>
<li>Rating: Unveiling insights, analysts deliver qualitative insights into stock performance, from 'Outperform' to 'Underperform'. These ratings convey expectations for the relative performance of APA compared to the broader market.</li>
<li>Price Targets: Analysts explore the dynamics of price targets, providing estimates for the future value of APA's stock. This examination reveals shifts in analysts' expectations over time.</li>
</ul>
For valuable insights into APA's market performance, consider these analyst evaluations alongside crucial financial indicators. Stay well-informed and make prudent decisions using our Ratings Table.
<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/APA/analyst-ratings?adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=analyst-ratings&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantage">Stay up to date on APA analyst ratings.</a>
<h2>About APA</h2>
APA Corp is an independent exploration and production company. It develops, and produces crude oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids. The Company's business has oil and gas operations in three geographic areas: the United States (U.S.), Egypt, and offshore the U.K. in the North Sea (North Sea). APA also has active development, exploration, and appraisal operations ongoing in Suriname, as well as exploration interests in Uruguay, Alaska, and other international locations.
<h3>Financial Insights: APA</h3>
Market Capitalization Analysis: The company exhibits a lower market capitalization profile, positioning itself below industry averages. This suggests a smaller scale relative to peers.
Revenue Growth: APA's remarkable performance in 3M is evident. As of 31 March, 2025, the company achieved an impressive revenue growth rate of 35.11%. This signifies a substantial increase in the company's top-line earnings. As compared to competitors, the company encountered difficulties, with a growth rate lower than the average among peers in the Energy sector.
Net Margin: APA's net margin surpasses industry standards, highlighting the company's exceptional financial performance. With an impressive 13.16% net margin, the company effectively manages costs and achieves strong profitability.
Return on Equity (ROE): APA's ROE stands out, surpassing industry averages. With an impressive ROE of 6.48%, the company demonstrates effective use of equity capital and strong financial performance.
Return on Assets (ROA): APA's ROA excels beyond industry benchmarks, reaching 1.83%. This signifies efficient management of assets and strong financial health.
Debt Management: APA's debt-to-equity ratio surpasses industry norms, standing at 1.01. This suggests the company carries a substantial amount of debt, posing potential financial challenges.
<h2>What Are Analyst Ratings?</h2>
Analysts work in banking and financial systems and typically specialize in reporting for stocks or defined sectors. Analysts may attend company conference calls and meetings, research company financial statements, and communicate with insiders to publish "analyst ratings" for stocks. Analysts typically rate each stock once per quarter.
Some analysts also offer predictions for helpful metrics such as earnings, revenue, and growth estimates to provide further guidance as to what to do with certain tickers. It is important to keep in mind that while stock and sector analysts are specialists, they are also human and can only forecast their beliefs to traders.
Which Stocks Are Analysts Recommending Now?
Benzinga Edge gives you instant access to all major analyst upgrades, downgrades, and price targets. Sort by accuracy, upside potential, and more. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/premium/ideas/benzinga-edge-checkout/?t=be8be9arja3be22bz21&amp;adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=analyst-ratings&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantage">Click here to stay ahead of the market</a>.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

Comments

Lucid Diagnostics

ニュース

最新ニュース Lucid Diagnostics (NASDAQ:LUCD) 株価情報

こんな人も見ています

ニュース

パートナーシップ

ベンジンガ・グローバル