VanEck Merk Gold ETFの空売り状況は、投資家がVanEck Merk Gold ETFの株価下落に賭けている度合いを知ることができます。空売りデータは2週間ごとに更新されます。

VanEck Merk Gold ETF (ARCA:OUNZ), 空売り情報

The investment seeks to provide investors with an opportunity to invest in gold through the shares and be able to take delivery of physical gold in exchange for those shares.

VanEck Merk Gold Trust

VanEck Merk Gold ETF

5 analysts have expressed a variety of opinions on Valvoline (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/VVV#NYSE">VVV</a>) over the past quarter, offering a diverse set of opinions from bullish to bearish.
Summarizing their recent assessments, the table below illustrates the evolving sentiments in the past 30 days and compares them to the preceding months.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th></th>
<th align="right">Bullish</th>
<th align="right">Somewhat Bullish</th>
<th align="right">Indifferent</th>
<th align="right">Somewhat Bearish</th>
<th align="right">Bearish</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Total Ratings</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">2</td>
<td align="right">2</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Last 30D</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1M Ago</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2M Ago</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>3M Ago</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
Analysts provide deeper insights through their assessments of 12-month price targets, revealing an average target of $41.2, a high estimate of $48.00, and a low estimate of $38.00. Experiencing a 3.63% decline, the current average is now lower than the previous average price target of $42.75. 
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1743800451_0.png" alt="price target chart" />
<h2>Deciphering Analyst Ratings: An In-Depth Analysis</h2>
An in-depth analysis of recent analyst actions unveils how financial experts perceive Valvoline. The following summary outlines key analysts, their recent evaluations, and adjustments to ratings and price targets.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Analyst</th>
<th>Analyst Firm</th>
<th>Action Taken</th>
<th>Rating</th>
<th>Current Price Target</th>
<th>Prior Price Target</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Max Rakhlenko</td>
<td>TD Securities</td>
<td>Announces</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$40.00</td>
<td>-</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Jeffrey Zekauskas</td>
<td>JP Morgan</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Neutral</td>
<td>$38.00</td>
<td>$37.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Steven Shemesh</td>
<td>RBC Capital</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Outperform</td>
<td>$48.00</td>
<td>$46.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Simeon Gutman</td>
<td>Morgan Stanley</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Equal-Weight</td>
<td>$38.00</td>
<td>$42.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>David Bellinger</td>
<td>Mizuho</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Outperform</td>
<td>$42.00</td>
<td>$46.00</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h3>Key Insights:</h3>
<ul>
<li>Action Taken: Analysts frequently update their recommendations based on evolving market conditions and company performance. Whether they 'Maintain', 'Raise' or 'Lower' their stance, it reflects their reaction to recent developments related to Valvoline. This information provides a snapshot of how analysts perceive the current state of the company.</li>
<li>Rating: Analysts assign qualitative assessments to stocks, ranging from 'Outperform' to 'Underperform'. These ratings convey the analysts' expectations for the relative performance of Valvoline compared to the broader market.</li>
<li>Price Targets: Delving into movements, analysts provide estimates for the future value of Valvoline's stock. This analysis reveals shifts in analysts' expectations over time.</li>
</ul>
Understanding these analyst evaluations alongside key financial indicators can offer valuable insights into Valvoline's market standing. Stay informed and make well-considered decisions with our Ratings Table.
<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/VVV/analyst-ratings?adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=analyst-ratings&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantage">Stay up to date on Valvoline analyst ratings.</a>
<h2>Discovering Valvoline: A Closer Look</h2>
Valvoline Inc produces, markets, and sells automotive maintenance products, particularly lubricants, to retail outlets installers, and customers. The company offers various products such as engine oil, heavy-duty engine oil, motorcycle oil, grease and brake fluid, and others. Geographically, the majority of the revenue is generated from the United States of America.
<h3>Breaking Down Valvoline's Financial Performance</h3>
Market Capitalization: Indicating a reduced size compared to industry averages, the company's market capitalization poses unique challenges.
Revenue Growth: Valvoline displayed positive results in 3 months. As of 31 December, 2024, the company achieved a solid revenue growth rate of approximately 10.95%. This indicates a notable increase in the company's top-line earnings. In comparison to its industry peers, the company stands out with a growth rate higher than the average among peers in the Consumer Discretionary sector.
Net Margin: Valvoline's net margin is impressive, surpassing industry averages. With a net margin of 22.11%, the company demonstrates strong profitability and effective cost management.
Return on Equity (ROE): The company's ROE is a standout performer, exceeding industry averages. With an impressive ROE of 44.1%, the company showcases effective utilization of equity capital.
Return on Assets (ROA): The company's ROA is a standout performer, exceeding industry averages. With an impressive ROA of 3.83%, the company showcases effective utilization of assets.
Debt Management: Valvoline's debt-to-equity ratio is notably higher than the industry average. With a ratio of 5.68, the company relies more heavily on borrowed funds, indicating a higher level of financial risk.
<h2>How Are Analyst Ratings Determined?</h2>
Analyst ratings serve as essential indicators of stock performance, provided by experts in banking and financial systems. These specialists diligently analyze company financial statements, participate in conference calls, and engage with insiders to generate quarterly ratings for individual stocks.
Some analysts publish their predictions for metrics such as growth estimates, earnings, and revenue to provide additional guidance with their ratings. When using analyst ratings, it is important to keep in mind that stock and sector analysts are also human and are only offering their opinions to investors.
Which Stocks Are Analysts Recommending Now?
Benzinga Edge gives you instant access to all major analyst upgrades, downgrades, and price targets. Sort by accuracy, upside potential, and more. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/premium/ideas/benzinga-edge-checkout/?t=be8be9arja3be22bz21&amp;adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=analyst-ratings&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantage">Click here to stay ahead of the market</a>.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

Analyst Ratings

The Analyst Verdict: Valvoline In The Eyes Of 5 Experts

Providing a diverse range of perspectives from bullish to bearish, 5 analysts have published ratings on Driven Brands Hldgs (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/DRVN#NASDAQ">DRVN</a>) in the last three months.
The table below offers a condensed view of their recent ratings, showcasing the changing sentiments over the past 30 days and comparing them to the preceding months.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th></th>
<th align="right">Bullish</th>
<th align="right">Somewhat Bullish</th>
<th align="right">Indifferent</th>
<th align="right">Somewhat Bearish</th>
<th align="right">Bearish</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Total Ratings</td>
<td align="right">2</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">2</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Last 30D</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1M Ago</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2M Ago</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">2</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>3M Ago</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
Insights from analysts' 12-month price targets are revealed, presenting an average target of $20.0, a high estimate of $23.00, and a low estimate of $16.00. Surpassing the previous average price target of $17.38, the current average has increased by 15.07%.
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1743800443_0.png" alt="price target chart" />
<h2>Understanding Analyst Ratings: A Comprehensive Breakdown</h2>
The perception of Driven Brands Hldgs by financial experts is analyzed through recent analyst actions. The following summary presents key analysts, their recent evaluations, and adjustments to ratings and price targets.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Analyst</th>
<th>Analyst Firm</th>
<th>Action Taken</th>
<th>Rating</th>
<th>Current Price Target</th>
<th>Prior Price Target</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Michael Albanese</td>
<td>Benchmark</td>
<td>Announces</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$22.00</td>
<td>-</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Peter Keith</td>
<td>Piper Sandler</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Overweight</td>
<td>$22.00</td>
<td>$19.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Brian McNamara</td>
<td>Canaccord Genuity</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$23.00</td>
<td>$21.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Christian Carlino</td>
<td>JP Morgan</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Neutral</td>
<td>$17.00</td>
<td>$14.50</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Tristan Thomas-Martin</td>
<td>BMO Capital</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Market Perform</td>
<td>$16.00</td>
<td>$15.00</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h3>Key Insights:</h3>
<ul>
<li>Action Taken: Analysts respond to changes in market conditions and company performance, frequently updating their recommendations. Whether they 'Maintain', 'Raise' or 'Lower' their stance, it reflects their reaction to recent developments related to Driven Brands Hldgs. This information offers a snapshot of how analysts perceive the current state of the company.</li>
<li>Rating: Analysts assign qualitative assessments to stocks, ranging from 'Outperform' to 'Underperform'. These ratings convey the analysts' expectations for the relative performance of Driven Brands Hldgs compared to the broader market.</li>
<li>Price Targets: Analysts provide insights into price targets, offering estimates for the future value of Driven Brands Hldgs's stock. This comparison reveals trends in analysts' expectations over time.</li>
</ul>
Navigating through these analyst evaluations alongside other financial indicators can contribute to a holistic understanding of Driven Brands Hldgs's market standing. Stay informed and make data-driven decisions with our Ratings Table.
<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/DRVN/analyst-ratings?adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=analyst-ratings&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantage">Stay up to date on Driven Brands Hldgs analyst ratings.</a>
<h2>All You Need to Know About Driven Brands Hldgs</h2>
Driven Brands Holdings Inc is an automotive services company in North America. Its platform provides high-quality services to an extensive range of retail and commercial customers. The company provides an extensive range of core consumer and commercial automotive needs, including paint, collision, glass, and repair services, as well as a variety of high-frequency services, such as oil changes and car washes. The company segments include: Maintenance, Car Wash, Paint, Collision &amp; Glass, and Platform Services. It derives maximum revenue from Maintenance Segment. Geographically, the company operates into United States, Canada and Rest of the World.
<h3>Driven Brands Hldgs's Financial Performance</h3>
Market Capitalization: With restricted market capitalization, the company is positioned below industry averages. This reflects a smaller scale relative to peers.
Revenue Growth: Driven Brands Hldgs's revenue growth over a period of 3 months has been noteworthy. As of 31 December, 2024, the company achieved a revenue growth rate of approximately 1.89%. This indicates a substantial increase in the company's top-line earnings. As compared to competitors, the company encountered difficulties, with a growth rate lower than the average among peers in the Industrials sector.
Net Margin: Driven Brands Hldgs's net margin is below industry averages, indicating potential challenges in maintaining strong profitability. With a net margin of -54.36%, the company may face hurdles in effective cost management.
Return on Equity (ROE): Driven Brands Hldgs's ROE falls below industry averages, indicating challenges in efficiently using equity capital. With an ROE of -39.06%, the company may face hurdles in generating optimal returns for shareholders.
Return on Assets (ROA): The company's ROA is below industry benchmarks, signaling potential difficulties in efficiently utilizing assets. With an ROA of -5.56%, the company may need to address challenges in generating satisfactory returns from its assets.
Debt Management: The company faces challenges in debt management with a debt-to-equity ratio higher than the industry average. With a ratio of 6.58, caution is advised due to increased financial risk.
<h2>How Are Analyst Ratings Determined?</h2>
Analyst ratings serve as essential indicators of stock performance, provided by experts in banking and financial systems. These specialists diligently analyze company financial statements, participate in conference calls, and engage with insiders to generate quarterly ratings for individual stocks.
Analysts may enhance their evaluations by incorporating forecasts for metrics like growth estimates, earnings, and revenue, delivering additional guidance to investors. It is vital to acknowledge that, although experts in stocks and sectors, analysts are human and express their opinions when providing insights.
Which Stocks Are Analysts Recommending Now?
Benzinga Edge gives you instant access to all major analyst upgrades, downgrades, and price targets. Sort by accuracy, upside potential, and more. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/premium/ideas/benzinga-edge-checkout/?t=be8be9arja3be22bz21&amp;adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=analyst-ratings&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantage">Click here to stay ahead of the market</a>.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

DRVN

Demystifying Driven Brands Hldgs: Insights From 5 Analyst Reviews

Greenbrier Companies (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/GBX#NYSE">GBX</a>) is preparing to release its quarterly earnings on Monday, 2025-04-07. Here's a brief overview of what investors should keep in mind before the announcement.
Analysts expect Greenbrier Companies to report an earnings per share (EPS) of $1.24.
Anticipation surrounds Greenbrier Companies's announcement, with investors hoping to hear about both surpassing estimates and receiving positive guidance for the next quarter.
New investors should understand that while earnings performance is important, market reactions are often driven by guidance.
<h3>Historical Earnings Performance</h3>
During the last quarter, the company reported an EPS beat by $0.57, leading to a 0.0% drop in the share price on the subsequent day.
Here's a look at Greenbrier Companies's past performance and the resulting price change:

<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Quarter</th>
<th>Q1 2025</th>
<th>Q4 2024</th>
<th>Q3 2024</th>
<th>Q2 2024</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>EPS Estimate</td>
<td>1.15</td>
<td>1.29</td>
<td>1.14</td>
<td>0.86</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>EPS Actual</td>
<td>1.72</td>
<td>1.92</td>
<td>1.06</td>
<td>1.03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Price Change %</td>
<td>0.0%</td>
<td>17.0%</td>
<td>3.0%</td>
<td>1.0%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>

<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1743800433_0.png" alt="eps graph" />
<h3>Market Performance of Greenbrier Companies's Stock</h3>
Shares of Greenbrier Companies were trading at $47.1 as of April 03. Over the last 52-week period, shares are down 15.6%. Given that these returns are generally negative, long-term shareholders are likely a little upset going into this earnings release. 
<h3>Analyst Opinions on Greenbrier Companies</h3>
For investors, grasping market sentiments and expectations in the industry is vital. This analysis explores the latest insights regarding Greenbrier Companies.
The consensus rating for Greenbrier Companies is Underperform, derived from 1 analyst ratings. An average one-year price target of $62.0 implies a potential 31.63% upside.
<h3>Understanding Analyst Ratings Among Peers</h3>
The following analysis focuses on the analyst ratings and average 1-year price targets of Blue Bird, Astec Industries and Trinity Indus, three prominent industry players, providing insights into their relative performance expectations and market positioning.
<ul>
<li>The consensus outlook from analysts is an Buy trajectory for Blue Bird, with an average 1-year price target of $57.5, indicating a potential 22.08% upside.</li>
<li>Analysts currently favor an Neutral trajectory for Astec Industries, with an average 1-year price target of $41.0, suggesting a potential 12.95% downside.</li>
<li>For Trinity Indus, analysts project an Neutral trajectory, with an average 1-year price target of $35.0, indicating a potential 25.69% downside.</li>
</ul>
<h3>Key Findings: Peer Analysis Summary</h3>
In the peer analysis summary, key metrics for Blue Bird, Astec Industries and Trinity Indus are highlighted, providing an understanding of their respective standings within the industry and offering insights into their market positions and comparative performance.

<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Company</th>
<th>Consensus</th>
<th>Revenue Growth</th>
<th>Gross Profit</th>
<th>Return on Equity</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Greenbrier Companies</td>
<td>Underperform</td>
<td>8.30%</td>
<td>$173.60M</td>
<td>3.97%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Blue Bird</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>-1.19%</td>
<td>$60.32M</td>
<td>16.93%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Astec Industries</td>
<td>Neutral</td>
<td>6.46%</td>
<td>$102.90M</td>
<td>3.32%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Trinity Indus</td>
<td>Neutral</td>
<td>-21.12%</td>
<td>$155M</td>
<td>2.73%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>

Key Takeaway:
Greenbrier Companies is at the top for Revenue Growth and Gross Profit, outperforming its peers. However, it is at the bottom for Return on Equity. Overall, Greenbrier Companies shows strong revenue growth and gross profit compared to its peers, but lags behind in terms of return on equity.
<h3>Get to Know Greenbrier Companies Better</h3>
Greenbrier Companies Inc designs, manufactures, and markets railroad freight car equipment in North America and Europe, marine barges in North America and provides wheel services, railcar refurbishment, and parts, leasing and other services to the railroad. Its segments include Manufacturing, Maintenance Services and Leasing &amp; Management Services. The company generates a majority of its revenue from the manufacturing segment. Geographically, it derives a majority of its revenue from the United States.
<h3>Understanding the Numbers: Greenbrier Companies's Finances</h3>
Market Capitalization Analysis: The company's market capitalization is below the industry average, suggesting that it is relatively smaller compared to peers. This could be due to various factors, including perceived growth potential or operational scale.
Revenue Growth: Greenbrier Companies displayed positive results in 3 months. As of 30 November, 2024, the company achieved a solid revenue growth rate of approximately 8.3%. This indicates a notable increase in the company's top-line earnings. As compared to its peers, the company achieved a growth rate higher than the average among peers in Industrials sector.
Net Margin: The company's net margin is a standout performer, exceeding industry averages. With an impressive net margin of 6.31%, the company showcases strong profitability and effective cost control.
Return on Equity (ROE): Greenbrier Companies's ROE excels beyond industry benchmarks, reaching 3.97%. This signifies robust financial management and efficient use of shareholder equity capital.
Return on Assets (ROA): Greenbrier Companies's financial strength is reflected in its exceptional ROA, which exceeds industry averages. With a remarkable ROA of 1.29%, the company showcases efficient use of assets and strong financial health.
Debt Management: Greenbrier Companies's debt-to-equity ratio is notably higher than the industry average. With a ratio of 1.35, the company relies more heavily on borrowed funds, indicating a higher level of financial risk.
<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/GBX/earnings">To track all earnings releases for Greenbrier Companies visit their earnings calendar on our site.</a>
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

Earnings

Greenbrier Companies's Earnings: A Preview

Analysts' ratings for Mosaic (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/MOS#NYSE">MOS</a>) over the last quarter vary from bullish to bearish, as provided by 16 analysts.
The table below provides a concise overview of recent ratings by analysts, offering insights into the changing sentiments over the past 30 days and drawing comparisons with the preceding months for a holistic perspective.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th></th>
<th align="right">Bullish</th>
<th align="right">Somewhat Bullish</th>
<th align="right">Indifferent</th>
<th align="right">Somewhat Bearish</th>
<th align="right">Bearish</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Total Ratings</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">5</td>
<td align="right">9</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Last 30D</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1M Ago</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">3</td>
<td align="right">2</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2M Ago</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">2</td>
<td align="right">3</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>3M Ago</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">3</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
Analysts provide deeper insights through their assessments of 12-month price targets, revealing an average target of $29.88, a high estimate of $34.00, and a low estimate of $26.00. Witnessing a positive shift, the current average has risen by 1.19% from the previous average price target of $29.53.
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1743800432_0.png" alt="price target chart" />
<h2>Exploring Analyst Ratings: An In-Depth Overview</h2>
An in-depth analysis of recent analyst actions unveils how financial experts perceive Mosaic. The following summary outlines key analysts, their recent evaluations, and adjustments to ratings and price targets.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Analyst</th>
<th>Analyst Firm</th>
<th>Action Taken</th>
<th>Rating</th>
<th>Current Price Target</th>
<th>Prior Price Target</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Andrew Wong</td>
<td>RBC Capital</td>
<td>Maintains</td>
<td>Sector Perform</td>
<td>$30.00</td>
<td>$28.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Kristen Owen</td>
<td>Oppenheimer</td>
<td>Maintains</td>
<td>Outperform</td>
<td>$33.00</td>
<td>$33.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Richard Garchitorena</td>
<td>Wells Fargo</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Equal-Weight</td>
<td>$28.00</td>
<td>$26.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Ben Isaacson</td>
<td>Scotiabank</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Sector Outperform</td>
<td>$34.00</td>
<td>$31.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Benjamin Theurer</td>
<td>Barclays</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Overweight</td>
<td>$33.00</td>
<td>$27.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Duffy Fischer</td>
<td>Goldman Sachs</td>
<td>Announces</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$31.00</td>
<td>-</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Benjamin Theurer</td>
<td>Barclays</td>
<td>Maintains</td>
<td>Equal-Weight</td>
<td>$27.00</td>
<td>$27.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Andrew Wong</td>
<td>RBC Capital</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Sector Perform</td>
<td>$28.00</td>
<td>$27.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Richard Garchitorena</td>
<td>Wells Fargo</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Equal-Weight</td>
<td>$26.00</td>
<td>$29.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Christopher Parkinson</td>
<td>Mizuho</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Neutral</td>
<td>$28.00</td>
<td>$29.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Ben Isaacson</td>
<td>Scotiabank</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Sector Outperform</td>
<td>$31.00</td>
<td>$34.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Jeffrey Zekaukas</td>
<td>JP Morgan</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Overweight</td>
<td>$29.00</td>
<td>$26.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Charles Neivert</td>
<td>Piper Sandler</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Neutral</td>
<td>$33.00</td>
<td>$30.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Benjamin Theurer</td>
<td>Barclays</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Underweight</td>
<td>$27.00</td>
<td>$30.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Nigel Dally</td>
<td>Morgan Stanley</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Equal-Weight</td>
<td>$30.00</td>
<td>$40.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Charles Neivert</td>
<td>Piper Sandler</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Neutral</td>
<td>$30.00</td>
<td>$26.00</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h3>Key Insights:</h3>
<ul>
<li>Action Taken: Analysts adapt their recommendations to changing market conditions and company performance. Whether they 'Maintain', 'Raise' or 'Lower' their stance, it reflects their response to recent developments related to Mosaic. This information provides a snapshot of how analysts perceive the current state of the company.</li>
<li>Rating: Offering insights into predictions, analysts assign qualitative values, from 'Outperform' to 'Underperform'. These ratings convey expectations for the relative performance of Mosaic compared to the broader market.</li>
<li>Price Targets: Analysts set price targets as an estimate of a stock's future value. Comparing the current and prior price targets provides insight into how analysts' expectations have changed over time. This information can be valuable for investors seeking to understand consensus views on the stock's potential future performance.</li>
</ul>
Capture valuable insights into Mosaic's market standing by understanding these analyst evaluations alongside pertinent financial indicators. Stay informed and make strategic decisions with our Ratings Table.
<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/MOS/analyst-ratings?adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=analyst-ratings&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantage">Stay up to date on Mosaic analyst ratings.</a>
<h2>Unveiling the Story Behind Mosaic</h2>
Mosaic is one of the largest phosphate and potash producers in the world. The company's assets include phosphate rock mines in Florida, Brazil, and Peru and potash mines in Saskatchewan, New Mexico, and Brazil. Mosaic also runs a large fertilizer distribution operation in Brazil through its Mosaic Fertilizantes business.
<h3>Mosaic: Financial Performance Dissected</h3>
Market Capitalization Analysis: The company's market capitalization is above the industry average, indicating that it is relatively larger in size compared to peers. This may suggest a higher level of investor confidence and market recognition.
Decline in Revenue: Over the 3 months period, Mosaic faced challenges, resulting in a decline of approximately -10.59% in revenue growth as of 31 December, 2024. This signifies a reduction in the company's top-line earnings. When compared to others in the Materials sector, the company faces challenges, achieving a growth rate lower than the average among peers.
Net Margin: Mosaic's net margin excels beyond industry benchmarks, reaching 6.0%. This signifies efficient cost management and strong financial health.
Return on Equity (ROE): Mosaic's ROE surpasses industry standards, highlighting the company's exceptional financial performance. With an impressive 1.45% ROE, the company effectively utilizes shareholder equity capital.
Return on Assets (ROA): Mosaic's financial strength is reflected in its exceptional ROA, which exceeds industry averages. With a remarkable ROA of 0.73%, the company showcases efficient use of assets and strong financial health.
Debt Management: Mosaic's debt-to-equity ratio is below the industry average. With a ratio of 0.39, the company relies less on debt financing, maintaining a healthier balance between debt and equity, which can be viewed positively by investors.
<h2>How Are Analyst Ratings Determined?</h2>
Benzinga tracks 150 analyst firms and reports on their stock expectations. Analysts typically arrive at their conclusions by predicting how much money a company will make in the future, usually the upcoming five years, and how risky or predictable that company's revenue streams are.
Analysts attend company conference calls and meetings, research company financial statements, and communicate with insiders to publish their ratings on stocks. Analysts typically rate each stock once per quarter or whenever the company has a major update.
Analysts may enhance their evaluations by incorporating forecasts for metrics like growth estimates, earnings, and revenue, delivering additional guidance to investors. It is vital to acknowledge that, although experts in stocks and sectors, analysts are human and express their opinions when providing insights.
Breaking: Wall Street's Next Big Mover
Benzinga's #1 analyst just identified a stock poised for explosive growth. This under-the-radar company could surge 200%+ as major market shifts unfold. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/premium/ideas/turning-point-trader-checkout-2/?t=Tu1tu3arja3be22tu36&amp;adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=analyst-ratings&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantag">Click here for urgent details</a>.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

Where Mosaic Stands With Analysts

AvalonBay Communities (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/AVB#NYSE">AVB</a>) underwent analysis by 9 analysts in the last quarter, revealing a spectrum of viewpoints from bullish to bearish.
The table below summarizes their recent ratings, showcasing the evolving sentiments within the past 30 days and comparing them to the preceding months.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th></th>
<th align="right">Bullish</th>
<th align="right">Somewhat Bullish</th>
<th align="right">Indifferent</th>
<th align="right">Somewhat Bearish</th>
<th align="right">Bearish</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Total Ratings</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">2</td>
<td align="right">7</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Last 30D</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1M Ago</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2M Ago</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">3</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>3M Ago</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">2</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
Analysts' evaluations of 12-month price targets offer additional insights, showcasing an average target of $233.89, with a high estimate of $265.00 and a low estimate of $220.00. Observing a downward trend, the current average is 1.68% lower than the prior average price target of $237.88. 
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1743800423_0.png" alt="price target chart" />
<h2>Interpreting Analyst Ratings: A Closer Look</h2>
The perception of AvalonBay Communities by financial experts is analyzed through recent analyst actions. The following summary presents key analysts, their recent evaluations, and adjustments to ratings and price targets.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Analyst</th>
<th>Analyst Firm</th>
<th>Action Taken</th>
<th>Rating</th>
<th>Current Price Target</th>
<th>Prior Price Target</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>John Kim</td>
<td>BMO Capital</td>
<td>Announces</td>
<td>Market Perform</td>
<td>$220.00</td>
<td>-</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Michael Lewis</td>
<td>Truist Securities</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Hold</td>
<td>$230.00</td>
<td>$229.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Richard Hightower</td>
<td>Barclays</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Equal-Weight</td>
<td>$226.00</td>
<td>$230.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Alexander Goldfarb</td>
<td>Piper Sandler</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Overweight</td>
<td>$265.00</td>
<td>$270.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Steve Sakwa</td>
<td>Evercore ISI Group</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>In-Line</td>
<td>$240.00</td>
<td>$230.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Brad Heffern</td>
<td>RBC Capital</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Sector Perform</td>
<td>$229.00</td>
<td>$226.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Richard Hightower</td>
<td>Barclays</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Equal-Weight</td>
<td>$230.00</td>
<td>$243.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Adam Kramer</td>
<td>Morgan Stanley</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Equal-Weight</td>
<td>$223.00</td>
<td>$236.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Vikram Malhotra</td>
<td>Mizuho</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Outperform</td>
<td>$242.00</td>
<td>$239.00</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h3>Key Insights:</h3>
<ul>
<li>Action Taken: In response to dynamic market conditions and company performance, analysts update their recommendations. Whether they 'Maintain', 'Raise', or 'Lower' their stance, it signifies their reaction to recent developments related to AvalonBay Communities. This insight gives a snapshot of analysts' perspectives on the current state of the company.</li>
<li>Rating: Analysts unravel qualitative evaluations for stocks, ranging from 'Outperform' to 'Underperform'. These ratings offer insights into expectations for the relative performance of AvalonBay Communities compared to the broader market.</li>
<li>Price Targets: Analysts gauge the dynamics of price targets, providing estimates for the future value of AvalonBay Communities's stock. This comparison reveals trends in analysts' expectations over time.</li>
</ul>
Considering these analyst evaluations in conjunction with other financial indicators can offer a comprehensive understanding of AvalonBay Communities's market position. Stay informed and make well-informed decisions with our Ratings Table.
<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/AVB/analyst-ratings?adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=analyst-ratings&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantage">Stay up to date on AvalonBay Communities analyst ratings.</a>
<h2>Discovering AvalonBay Communities: A Closer Look</h2>
AvalonBay Communities owns a portfolio of 289 apartment communities with over 87,000 units and is developing 17 additional properties with over 6,000 units. The company focuses on owning large, high-quality properties in major metropolitan areas of New England, New York/New Jersey, Washington, D.C., California, and the Pacific Northwest.
<h3>AvalonBay Communities: A Financial Overview</h3>
Market Capitalization: Positioned above industry average, the company's market capitalization underscores its superiority in size, indicative of a strong market presence.
Positive Revenue Trend: Examining AvalonBay Communities's financials over 3 months reveals a positive narrative. The company achieved a noteworthy revenue growth rate of 5.09% as of 31 December, 2024, showcasing a substantial increase in top-line earnings. As compared to its peers, the company achieved a growth rate higher than the average among peers in Real Estate sector.
Net Margin: AvalonBay Communities's financial strength is reflected in its exceptional net margin, which exceeds industry averages. With a remarkable net margin of 37.81%, the company showcases strong profitability and effective cost management.
Return on Equity (ROE): AvalonBay Communities's ROE excels beyond industry benchmarks, reaching 2.35%. This signifies robust financial management and efficient use of shareholder equity capital.
Return on Assets (ROA): AvalonBay Communities's ROA excels beyond industry benchmarks, reaching 1.32%. This signifies efficient management of assets and strong financial health.
Debt Management: With a below-average debt-to-equity ratio of 0.69, AvalonBay Communities adopts a prudent financial strategy, indicating a balanced approach to debt management.
<h2>How Are Analyst Ratings Determined?</h2>
Analyst ratings serve as essential indicators of stock performance, provided by experts in banking and financial systems. These specialists diligently analyze company financial statements, participate in conference calls, and engage with insiders to generate quarterly ratings for individual stocks.
Analysts may supplement their ratings with predictions for metrics like growth estimates, earnings, and revenue, offering investors a more comprehensive outlook. However, investors should be mindful that analysts, like any human, can have subjective perspectives influencing their forecasts.
Which Stocks Are Analysts Recommending Now?
Benzinga Edge gives you instant access to all major analyst upgrades, downgrades, and price targets. Sort by accuracy, upside potential, and more. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/premium/ideas/benzinga-edge-checkout/?t=be8be9arja3be22bz21&amp;adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=analyst-ratings&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantage">Click here to stay ahead of the market</a>.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

9 Analysts Have This To Say About AvalonBay Communities

Levi Strauss (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/LEVI#NYSE">LEVI</a>) is preparing to release its quarterly earnings on Monday, 2025-04-07. Here's a brief overview of what investors should keep in mind before the announcement.
Analysts expect Levi Strauss to report an earnings per share (EPS) of $0.31.
Investors in Levi Strauss are eagerly awaiting the company's announcement, hoping for news of surpassing estimates and positive guidance for the next quarter.
It's worth noting for new investors that stock prices can be heavily influenced by future projections rather than just past performance.
<h3>Performance in Previous Earnings</h3>
The company's EPS beat by $0.02 in the last quarter, leading to a 4.2% increase in the share price on the following day.
Here's a look at Levi Strauss's past performance and the resulting price change:

<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Quarter</th>
<th>Q4 2024</th>
<th>Q3 2024</th>
<th>Q2 2024</th>
<th>Q1 2024</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>EPS Estimate</td>
<td>0.48</td>
<td>0.31</td>
<td>0.11</td>
<td>0.21</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>EPS Actual</td>
<td>0.50</td>
<td>0.33</td>
<td>0.16</td>
<td>0.26</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Price Change %</td>
<td>4.0%</td>
<td>-8.0%</td>
<td>-15.0%</td>
<td>12.0%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>

<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1743800424_0.png" alt="eps graph" />
<h3>Market Performance of Levi Strauss's Stock</h3>
Shares of Levi Strauss were trading at $14.44 as of April 03. Over the last 52-week period, shares are down 32.41%. Given that these returns are generally negative, long-term shareholders are likely upset going into this earnings release. 
<h3>Analyst Insights on Levi Strauss</h3>
Understanding market sentiments and expectations within the industry is crucial for investors. This analysis delves into the latest insights on Levi Strauss.
Analysts have provided Levi Strauss with 13 ratings, resulting in a consensus rating of Neutral. The average one-year price target stands at $21.38, suggesting a potential 48.06% upside.
<h3>Peer Ratings Overview</h3>
The below comparison of the analyst ratings and average 1-year price targets of VF, PVH and Kontoor Brands, three prominent players in the industry, gives insights for their relative performance expectations and market positioning.
<ul>
<li>VF received a Neutral consensus from analysts, with an average 1-year price target of $24.94, implying a potential 72.71% upside.</li>
<li>For PVH, analysts project an Neutral trajectory, with an average 1-year price target of $99.38, indicating a potential 588.23% upside.</li>
<li>Analysts currently favor an Outperform trajectory for Kontoor Brands, with an average 1-year price target of $97.4, suggesting a potential 574.52% upside.</li>
</ul>
<h3>Peer Analysis Summary</h3>
In the peer analysis summary, key metrics for VF, PVH and Kontoor Brands are highlighted, providing an understanding of their respective standings within the industry and offering insights into their market positions and comparative performance.

<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Company</th>
<th>Consensus</th>
<th>Revenue Growth</th>
<th>Gross Profit</th>
<th>Return on Equity</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Levi Strauss</td>
<td>Neutral</td>
<td>12.02%</td>
<td>$1.13B</td>
<td>9.50%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>VF</td>
<td>Neutral</td>
<td>1.93%</td>
<td>$1.60B</td>
<td>10.87%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>PVH</td>
<td>Neutral</td>
<td>-4.75%</td>
<td>$1.38B</td>
<td>3.01%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Kontoor Brands</td>
<td>Outperform</td>
<td>4.40%</td>
<td>$305.56M</td>
<td>16.90%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>

Key Takeaway:
Levi Strauss ranks in the middle among peers for revenue growth, with one peer outperforming. It ranks at the bottom for gross profit, with all peers reporting higher figures. For return on equity, Levi Strauss is at the bottom, with one peer significantly outperforming. Overall, Levi Strauss is positioned lower compared to its peers across key financial metrics.
<h3>Discovering Levi Strauss: A Closer Look</h3>
Levi Strauss &amp; Co is involved in designing, marketing, and selling products that include jeans, casual and dresses pants, tops, shorts, skirts, jackets, footwear, and related accessories directly or through third parties and licensees for men, women, and children under Levi's, Dockers, Signature by Levi Strauss &amp; Co. and Denizen brands. The company manages its business according to three regional segments: the Americas, which is the key revenue driver; Europe; and Asia.
<h3>Levi Strauss: Financial Performance Dissected</h3>
Market Capitalization Analysis: The company's market capitalization is above the industry average, indicating that it is relatively larger in size compared to peers. This may suggest a higher level of investor confidence and market recognition.
Positive Revenue Trend: Examining Levi Strauss's financials over 3 months reveals a positive narrative. The company achieved a noteworthy revenue growth rate of 12.02% as of 30 November, 2024, showcasing a substantial increase in top-line earnings. As compared to its peers, the company achieved a growth rate higher than the average among peers in Consumer Discretionary sector.
Net Margin: Levi Strauss's net margin surpasses industry standards, highlighting the company's exceptional financial performance. With an impressive 9.93% net margin, the company effectively manages costs and achieves strong profitability.
Return on Equity (ROE): Levi Strauss's financial strength is reflected in its exceptional ROE, which exceeds industry averages. With a remarkable ROE of 9.5%, the company showcases efficient use of equity capital and strong financial health.
Return on Assets (ROA): Levi Strauss's ROA stands out, surpassing industry averages. With an impressive ROA of 2.89%, the company demonstrates effective utilization of assets and strong financial performance.
Debt Management: With a below-average debt-to-equity ratio of 1.12, Levi Strauss adopts a prudent financial strategy, indicating a balanced approach to debt management.
<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/LEVI/earnings">To track all earnings releases for Levi Strauss visit their earnings calendar on our site.</a>
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

LEVI

Earnings Outlook For Levi Strauss

In the current session, GSK Inc. (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/GSK#NYSE">GSK</a>) is trading at $37.71, after a 3.33% decrease. Over the past month, the stock fell by 8.79%, and in the past year, by 10.58%. With performance like this, long-term shareholders are more likely to start looking into the company's price-to-earnings ratio. 

<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1743800417_0.png" alt="Past Year Chart" />

<h3>GSK P/E Ratio Analysis in Relation to Industry Peers</h3>
The P/E ratio measures the current share price to the company's EPS. It is used by long-term investors to analyze the company's current performance against it's past earnings, historical data and aggregate market data for the industry or the indices, such as S&amp;P 500. A higher P/E indicates that investors expect the company to perform better in the future, and the stock is probably overvalued, but not necessarily. It also could indicate that investors are willing to pay a higher share price currently, because they expect the company to perform better in the upcoming quarters. This leads investors to also remain optimistic about rising dividends in the future. 
Compared to the aggregate P/E ratio of the 28.33 in the Pharmaceuticals industry, GSK Inc. has a lower P/E ratio of 24.27. Shareholders might be inclined to think that the stock might perform worse than it's industry peers. It's also possible that the stock is undervalued. 

<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1743800417_1.png" alt="Guage" />

In conclusion, the price-to-earnings ratio is a useful metric for analyzing a company's market performance, but it has its limitations. While a lower P/E can indicate that a company is undervalued, it can also suggest that shareholders do not expect future growth. Additionally, the P/E ratio should not be used in isolation, as other factors such as industry trends and business cycles can also impact a company's stock price. Therefore, investors should use the P/E ratio in conjunction with other financial metrics and qualitative analysis to make informed investment decisions.

News

Intraday Update

Markets

A Look Into GSK Inc's Price Over Earnings

Dave &amp; Buster's Enter (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/PLAY#NASDAQ">PLAY</a>) will release its quarterly earnings report on Monday, 2025-04-07. Here's a brief overview for investors ahead of the announcement.
Analysts anticipate Dave &amp; Buster's Enter to report an earnings per share (EPS) of $0.72.
Dave &amp; Buster's Enter bulls will hope to hear the company announce they've not only beaten that estimate, but also to provide positive guidance, or forecasted growth, for the next quarter.
New investors should note that it is sometimes not an earnings beat or miss that most affects the price of a stock, but the guidance (or forecast).
<h3>Past Earnings Performance</h3>
Last quarter the company missed EPS by $0.09, which was followed by a 20.08% drop in the share price the next day.
Here's a look at Dave &amp; Buster's Enter's past performance and the resulting price change:

<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Quarter</th>
<th>Q3 2024</th>
<th>Q2 2024</th>
<th>Q1 2024</th>
<th>Q4 2023</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>EPS Estimate</td>
<td>-0.36</td>
<td>0.84</td>
<td>1.70</td>
<td>1.10</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>EPS Actual</td>
<td>-0.45</td>
<td>1.12</td>
<td>1.12</td>
<td>1.03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Price Change %</td>
<td>-20.0%</td>
<td>5.0%</td>
<td>-11.0%</td>
<td>10.0%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>

<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1743800414_0.png" alt="eps graph" />
<h3>Dave &amp; Buster's Enter Share Price Analysis</h3>
Shares of Dave &amp; Buster's Enter were trading at $17.0 as of April 03. Over the last 52-week period, shares are down 73.7%. Given that these returns are generally negative, long-term shareholders are likely bearish going into this earnings release. 
<h3>Analyst Opinions on Dave &amp; Buster's Enter</h3>
Understanding market sentiments and expectations within the industry is crucial for investors. This analysis delves into the latest insights on Dave &amp; Buster's Enter.
The consensus rating for Dave &amp; Buster's Enter is Neutral, derived from 2 analyst ratings. An average one-year price target of $24.0 implies a potential 41.18% upside.
<h3>Comparing Ratings Among Industry Peers</h3>
The following analysis focuses on the analyst ratings and average 1-year price targets of RCI Hospitality Hldgs, Six Flags Entertainment and Vail Resorts, three prominent industry players, providing insights into their relative performance expectations and market positioning.
<ul>
<li>The consensus outlook from analysts is an Buy trajectory for RCI Hospitality Hldgs, with an average 1-year price target of $98.0, indicating a potential 476.47% upside.</li>
<li>Analysts currently favor an Buy trajectory for Six Flags Entertainment, with an average 1-year price target of $50.5, suggesting a potential 197.06% upside.</li>
<li>The consensus among analysts is an Underperform trajectory for Vail Resorts, with an average 1-year price target of $177.17, indicating a potential 942.18% upside.</li>
</ul>
<h3>Peers Comparative Analysis Summary</h3>
Within the peer analysis summary, vital metrics for RCI Hospitality Hldgs, Six Flags Entertainment and Vail Resorts are presented, shedding light on their respective standings within the industry and offering valuable insights into their market positions and comparative performance.

<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Company</th>
<th>Consensus</th>
<th>Revenue Growth</th>
<th>Gross Profit</th>
<th>Return on Equity</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Dave &amp; Buster's Enter</td>
<td>Neutral</td>
<td>-2.98%</td>
<td>$385.20M</td>
<td>-12.80%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>RCI Hospitality Hldgs</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>-3.28%</td>
<td>$41.44M</td>
<td>3.39%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Six Flags Entertainment</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>85.20%</td>
<td>$629.51M</td>
<td>-12.06%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Vail Resorts</td>
<td>Underperform</td>
<td>5.50%</td>
<td>$571.87M</td>
<td>50.38%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>

Key Takeaway:
Dave &amp; Buster's Enter ranks at the bottom for Revenue Growth and Gross Profit, indicating weaker performance in these areas compared to its peers. However, it is in the middle for Return on Equity, suggesting average profitability relative to others. Overall, there is room for improvement in revenue generation and gross profit margins to align with industry peers.
<h3>Get to Know Dave &amp; Buster's Enter Better</h3>
Dave &amp; Buster's Entertainment Inc owns and operates nearly a hundred entertainment and dining establishments in the United States where customers can eat, drink, play games, and watch televised sports. Each store offers a full menu of entries and appetizers, a complete selection of alcoholic and non-alcoholic beverages, and an extensive assortment of entertainment attractions centered around playing games and watching live sports and other televised events. It derives maximum revenue from Entertainment.
<h3>Breaking Down Dave &amp; Buster's Enter's Financial Performance</h3>
Market Capitalization Perspectives: The company's market capitalization falls below industry averages, signaling a relatively smaller size compared to peers. This positioning may be influenced by factors such as perceived growth potential or operational scale.
Negative Revenue Trend: Examining Dave &amp; Buster's Enter's financials over 3 months reveals challenges. As of 31 October, 2024, the company experienced a decline of approximately -2.98% in revenue growth, reflecting a decrease in top-line earnings. When compared to others in the Consumer Discretionary sector, the company faces challenges, achieving a growth rate lower than the average among peers.
Net Margin: The company's net margin is a standout performer, exceeding industry averages. With an impressive net margin of -7.22%, the company showcases strong profitability and effective cost control.
Return on Equity (ROE): Dave &amp; Buster's Enter's ROE is below industry averages, indicating potential challenges in efficiently utilizing equity capital. With an ROE of -12.8%, the company may face hurdles in achieving optimal financial returns.
Return on Assets (ROA): Dave &amp; Buster's Enter's ROA lags behind industry averages, suggesting challenges in maximizing returns from its assets. With an ROA of -0.84%, the company may face hurdles in achieving optimal financial performance.
Debt Management: The company faces challenges in debt management with a debt-to-equity ratio higher than the industry average. With a ratio of 13.76, caution is advised due to increased financial risk.
<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/PLAY/earnings">To track all earnings releases for Dave &amp; Buster's Enter visit their earnings calendar on our site.</a>
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

PLAY

Dave & Buster's Enter's Earnings: A Preview

Gartner (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/IT#NYSE">IT</a>) has outperformed the market over the past 10 years by 7.09% on an annualized basis producing an average annual return of 16.33%. Currently, Gartner has a market capitalization of $29.44 billion. 
Buying $1000 In IT: If an investor had bought $1000 of IT stock 10 years ago, it would be worth $4,545.07 today based on a price of $383.24 for IT at the time of writing.
<h3>Gartner's Performance Over Last 10 Years</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1743800412_0.png" alt="comp_fig" />
Finally -- what's the point of all this? The key insight to take from this article is to note how much of a difference compounded returns can make in your cash growth over a period of time.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

Trading Ideas

If You Invested $1000 In This Stock 10 Years Ago, You Would Have This Much Today

BofA Securities analyst Joshua Shanker downgraded Progressive Corp (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/PGR#NYSE">PGR</a>) from Buy to Neutral, lowering<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/PGR/analyst-ratings" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"> the price forecast from $300 to $287.</a>
Shanker noted that while investors have recently shifted into Progressive as a &#8220;defensive&#8221; play amid recession concerns and new U.S. tariffs, it&#8217;s important to recognize that the company may currently be experiencing a cyclical &#8220;margin peak.&#8221;
Although auto insurance is inherently a cyclical business, Progressive has benefited from its defensive positioning in the market.
However, earnings growth is expected to &#8220;decelerate&#8221; in 2026, even though the analyst&#8217;s forecasts remain higher than consensus, albeit no longer the most optimistic among peers.
Also Read: <a target="_blank" href="https://www.benzinga.com/general/market-summary/25/04/44643100/us-stocks-likely-to-open-lower-after-the-worst-selloff-since-2020-tariff-announcement-was-100-smoot-hawley-disguised-as-thoughtful-policy-says-expert" rel="noreferrer noopener">Stocks Set To Continue Crashing After Worst Selloff Since 2020: Tariff Announcement Was &#8216;100% Smoot Hawley Disguised As Thoughtful Policy,&#8217; Says Expert</a>
Shanker&#8217;s earnings per share forecasts for Progressive stand at $18.35, $18.80 and $20.40 for 2025 through 2027, respectively — each representing a significant premium of 18% to 21% above current consensus estimates.
While acknowledging that it may seem counterintuitive to consider a downgrade under such optimistic projections, the analyst indicated that there are underlying reasons that justify a more cautious stance.
The analyst pointed out that Progressive has achieved a 15% compound annual growth rate in revenue over the past decade through 2024, primarily through organic means, with minimal changes to its share count. The company&#8217;s small acquisitions, such as ARX and Protective, were completed using cash rather than equity.
Additionally, operating earnings per share have grown at a 22% annual rate over the same period, well above the typical growth seen across the insurance sector.
The analyst acknowledged tariffs might negatively impact margins more than anticipated, similar to how inflation in used cars and parts during 2021–2022 drove up loss costs for auto insurers.
Shanker does not see this as a major factor in valuing Progressive.
Emphasizing the cyclical nature of the business, the analyst suggested that while periods of over- and under-earning are inevitable, the long-term growth trajectory remains the most important consideration.
PGR Price Action: Progressive shares closed down 10.23% at $257.64 on Friday.
Read Next:
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/25/04/44623855/billionaire-investor-ray-dalio-warns-of-abrupt-unconventional-changes-in-markets-heres-how-the-tariff-machine-aff" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Ray Dalio Warns Of ‘Abrupt, Unconventional Changes&#8217; In Markets: Here&#8217;s How The ‘Tariff Machine&#8217; Affects Currency, Monetary And Fiscal Policies</a></li>
</ul>
Photo: T. Schneider via Shutterstock

Equities

Downgrades

Movers

General

Cyclical Ceiling In Sight? BofA Turns Cautious On Progressive During Macro Shifts

PTC (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/PTC#NASDAQ">PTC</a>) has outperformed the market over the past 5 years by 4.94% on an annualized basis producing an average annual return of 18.7%. Currently, PTC has a market capitalization of $16.82 billion. 
Buying $100 In PTC: If an investor had bought $100 of PTC stock 5 years ago, it would be worth $234.55 today based on a price of $139.77 for PTC at the time of writing.
<h3>PTC's Performance Over Last 5 Years</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1743799509_0.png" alt="comp_fig" />
Finally -- what's the point of all this? The key insight to take from this article is to note how much of a difference compounded returns can make in your cash growth over a period of time.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

Here's How Much $100 Invested In PTC 5 Years Ago Would Be Worth Today

BofA Securities analyst Craig Siegenthaler revised estimates and price forecasts for several broker <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/topic/broker" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">stocks ahead of earnings season</a>.
The analyst writes that a deeper equity market correction poses EPS risks from cash sweep revenues, trading/margin loans, and AUM-based fees.
Siegenthaler expects further NNA slowdowns, especially in higher ROCA retail channel vs. wealth manager, projecting a modest dip in March.
Since the correction happened late in the quarter, most risks will surface in the second quarter instead of the first quarter of 2025, adds the analyst.
Charles Schwab: The analyst projects Charles Schwab Corporation&#8217;s (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/SCHW#NYSE">SCHW</a>) NII to keep rising, regardless of market or rates, as it pays down its costly FHLB/CD borrowings.
He sees a third consecutive quarter of net new asset growth, with a 4.7% estimate, near the low end of the company&#8217;s 5%-7% target.
The analyst reiterated the Underperform rating on the company and lowered the <a target="_blank" href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/schw/analyst-ratings" rel="noreferrer noopener">price forecast from $74 to $66</a>.
Also, Siegenthaler revised EPS estimates for first-quarter FY25 to $1.03 (from $1.01), 2026 to $4.27 (from $4.82) and 2027 to $4.73 (from $5.26) due to the negative impact of a reduced interest rate forecast and lower AUM-based fees.
Meanwhile, the analyst maintains a long-term bullish stance on retail brokers, particularly online brokers like Interactive Brokers Group Inc. (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/IBKR#NASDAQ">IBKR</a>) and Robinhood Markets Inc. (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/HOOD#NASDAQ">HOOD</a>), as their valuations and ownership setups have improved post-correction year-to-date.
Siegenthaler continues to view online brokerage as a global secular trend, benefiting from its high-tech, low-cost model, which reaches mass customers at low price points and capitalizes on the demographic shift to digital.
Overall, the analyst maintains the Buy rating on LPL Financial Holdings Inc (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/LPLA#NASDAQ">LPLA</a>), thanks to strong <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/lpla/analyst-ratings" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">organic growth and stable ROCA</a>.
Interactive Brokers Group: The analyst reduced the Interactive Brokers Group stock&#8217;s price <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/ibkr/analyst-ratings" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">forecast from $307 to $265</a>.
Siegenthaler forecasts a 3% quarter-over-quarter revenue increase driven by higher trading volumes, with account growth expected to accelerate to 32%.
The analyst lowered first-quarter/2026/2027 EPS estimates to $1.99/$8.90/$10.62, from $2/$10.14/$12.27, respectively due to expectations of lower client engagement and the impact of lower short-term interest rates on net interest income.
Coinbase: Meanwhile, the analyst notes the strong trading levels Coinbase Global Inc. (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/COIN#NASDAQ">COIN</a>) in the fourth quarter of 2024 were tough to replicate in the first quarter of FY25, with a decline in crypto prices slowing client activity.
As a result, the analyst lowered Coinbase's 2026/27 EPS estimates by over 10% and reduced the price forecast from $311 to $217.
Robinhood Markets: The analyst lowered the stock price <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/hood/analyst-ratings" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">target from $65 to $58</a>.
While Siegenthaler expects Robinhood&#8217;s revenues to rise 44% year-over-year, this still represents a 12% quarter-over-quarter decline due to lower trading.
At Robinhood, the analyst also anticipates higher expenses and a return to a normal 21% tax rate after previously being at 0% or lower since its 2021 listing.
The analyst revised the first-quarter FY25/2026/2027 EPS estimates to 29 cents/$1.49/$1.94, from 43 cents/$1.76/$2.18, respectively, due to a lower interest rate forecast, decelerating trading volumes, higher G&amp;A expenses, and a return to a normal tax rate.
Meanwhile, the analyst remains optimistic about the company&#8217;s long-term growth, driven by business expansion, new product launches, strong client relationships, and market growth both globally (including Singapore) and domestically.
Read Next:
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/analyst-ratings/analyst-color/25/04/44614042/jpmorgan-wells-fargo-morgan-stanley-bny-mellon-will-strike-a-cautious-tone-analysts" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">JPMorgan, Wells Fargo, Morgan Stanley, BNY Mellon Will &#8216;Strike A Cautious Tone&#8217;: Analysts</a></li>
</ul>
Photo: Shutterstock

Large Cap

Mid Cap

Price Target

Personal Finance

COIN

HOOD

IBKR

LPLA

SCHW

BofA Analyst Forecasts Slower Growth For Broker Stocks As Market Volatility Increases

ALMS

SLRN

Alumis and ACELYRIN File Joint Definitive Proxy Statement For Proposed Merger; Boards Unanimously Recommend Stockholders Vote "For" The Merger

On March 31, 2025, Atara Biotherapeutics, Inc., (the "Company") entered into an Amendment (the "Amendment") to the Amended and Restated Commercialization Agreement dated October 31, 2023 (the "Agreement") with Pierre Fabre Medicament ("Pierre Fabre"). Under the terms of the Amendment, as of March 31, 2025, the Company has completed the transfer of all manufacturing responsibility to Pierre Fabre and Pierre Fabre will be, at its cost, responsible for manufacturing and supplying tabelecleucel for development and commercialization worldwide. Pierre Fabre has also agreed to assume the costs related to remediation of the third-party manufacturing facility to address the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's (the "FDA") requests to support resubmission of the BLA for tab-cel.
In exchange for accelerating the transfer of all manufacturing responsibility and assumption of such remediation costs by Pierre Fabre, among other things, the Company agreed to reduce the amount of certain potential future regulatory and commercial milestone payments under the Agreement. The Amendment did not change any of the royalties the Company is eligible to receive under the Agreement. Pursuant to the Amendment, the Company is now entitled to receive an aggregate of up to $550.0 million in additional potential milestone payments upon achieving certain regulatory and commercial milestones relating to tab-cel, including up to $40.0 million in potential regulatory milestones in connection with the approval by the FDA of a BLA for tab-cel under the terms of the Agreement (as amended by the Amendment).

Contracts

ATRA

Atara Biotherapeutics Transfers Full Manufacturing Responsibility For Tabelecleucel To Pierre Fabre; Now Entitled To Receive Up To $550M In Additional Potential Milestone Payments Upon Achieving Certain Regulatory And Commercial Milestones Relating To Tab-cel, Including Up To $40M In Potential Regulatory Milestones In Connection With The Approval By The FDA Of A BLA For Tab-cel

VZLA

Vizsla Silver Corp. Pauses Field Of Work At Panuco Project Out Of Abundance Of Caution Due to Security Conditions In The Area

NOVA

Sunnova Received NYSE Noncompliance Notice

CHGG

Chegg Received NYSE Noncompliance Notice

Guidance

DOCN

DigitalOcean Holdings Reaffirms Guidance For Fiscal Quarter Ended March 31, 2025 And Year Ended Dec 31, 2025

RILY

B. Riley Financial Receives Delinquency Notice From Nasdaq Indicating Co. Is Not In Compliance As A Result Of Delayed 10-K Filling

The stock market took a dive, but <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/news/25/03/44132684/cathie-woods-bold-move-8-straight-days-of-buying-beam-therapeutics-as-stock-soars-14">Cathie Wood</a> didn&#8217;t flinch. Instead of retreating, the Ark Invest CEO saw an opportunity and went on a buying spree. According to<a href="https://www.investors.com/news/cathie-wood-ark-invest-coinbase-stock-robinhood-tesla-palantir-amd-coin-hood-tsla-pltr/"> Investor&#8217;s Business Daily</a>, her firm snapped up shares of Tesla (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/TSLA#NASDAQ">TSLA</a>), Robinhood (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/HOOD#NASDAQ">HOOD</a>), Coinbase (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/COIN#NASDAQ">COIN</a>), Palantir Technologies (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/PLTR#NYSE">PLTR</a>), and more on March 10.
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Big Bets in a Turbulent Market</h2>
Investor&#8217;s Business Daily said that Ark Invest picked up 79,318 shares of Tesla, valued at $17.62 million based on Monday&#8217;s closing price of $222.15. The firm also acquired 269,864 shares of Robinhood for $9.6 million and 64,358 shares of Coinbase, worth $11.53 million.&nbsp;
Don't Miss:
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/are-you-rich">Are you rich?</a> Here&#8217;s what Americans think you need to be considered wealthy.</li>
<li>If there was a new fund backed by Jeff Bezos offering a <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/arrived-private-credit-fund">7-9% target yield with monthly dividends would you invest in it</a>?</li>
</ul>
Other buys included 147,551 shares of Advanced Micro Devices (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/AMD#NASDAQ">AMD</a>) for $14.26 million, 152,253 shares of Palantir at $11.63 million, and 485,005 shares of Beam Therapeutics (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/BEAM#NASDAQ">BEAM</a>), valued at $12.46 million.
It&#8217;s a familiar strategy for Wood, who has built a reputation for &#8220;buying the dip.&#8221; She firmly believes in disruptive innovation and has placed some of her biggest bets on Tesla.&nbsp;
Wood thinks part of the recent demand dip for Tesla could result from broader fears about the economy. In a recent<a href="https://www.ark-funds.com/webinars/mar-2025-fund-webinar?utm_medium=email&amp;_hsmi=353364069&amp;utm_content=353364069&amp;utm_source=hs_email"> Ark Invest webinar</a>, she said, &#8220;Now, clearly, the political dynamics of the last few months are hitting demand; we also would suggest that the economic outlook is hitting demand—not just for Tesla—but for all auto manufacturers.&#8221;&nbsp;
Trending: BlackRock is calling 2025 the year of alternative assets. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/masterworks">One firm from NYC has quietly built a group of 60,000+ investors who have all joined in on an alt asset class previously exclusive to billionaires like Bezos and Gates.</a>
Despite the stock&#8217;s 31% decline this year and a growing list of challenges, Wood has maintained a bullish outlook. She told <a href="https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-03-25/cathie-wood-sticks-with-tesla-predicts-stock-will-hit-2-600">Bloomberg TV</a> that Tesla&#8217;s price could soar over the next five years.
Tesla has been at the center of controversy for months. Since Elon Musk&#8217;s closer ties with the Trump administration, the electric vehicle company has faced public protests, boycotts, and even vandalism.&nbsp;
Musk&#8217;s role as an advisor to the Department of Government Efficiency has drawn criticism, with some accusing the CEO of shifting the company into politically charged territory.
See Also: Have $200K saved?<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/have-200k-saved-heres-how-to-turn-it-into-lasting-wealth"> Here's how to turn it into lasting wealth</a>
The turmoil has had financial consequences. Tesla&#8217;s stock has been on a downward trend, while competitors, particularly China&#8217;s BYD, have continued to gain market share. According to <a href="https://edition.cnn.com/2025/03/20/business/even-used-teslas-are-falling-out-of-favor/index.html">CNN</a>, Tesla vehicles&#8217; resale value has also dropped over the past month.
Amid the backlash, President Donald Trump publicly backed Musk. He said on <a href="https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/114141854575248527">Truth Social </a>that he would buy a Tesla, calling it a &#8220;show of confidence&#8221; in the company. The move follows a broader effort by Trump&#8217;s administration to support Tesla.&nbsp;
Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, the commerce secretary, encouraged Americans to invest in the company.&nbsp;
&#8220;I think if you want to learn something on this show tonight, buy <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/news/25/03/44209579/unprecedented-slide-tesla-sales-plummet-45-in-europe-as-musks-net-worth-dives-5-2b-in-a-week">Tesla</a>. It&#8217;s unbelievable that this guy&#8217;s stock is this cheap. It&#8217;ll never be this cheap again,&#8221; ​he told Fox News on March 19.
Read Next:
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/gbr-savings-by-age">If You're Age 35, 50, or 60: Here&#8217;s How Much You Should Have Saved Vs. Invested By Now</a></li>
<li>Can you guess how many retire with a $5,000,000 nest egg? <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/5mil-nest-egg-adv">The percentage may shock you</a>.</li>
</ul>

Comments

VanEck Merk Gold ETF

空売り

VanEck Merk Gold ETF (ARCA:OUNZ), 空売り情報

ニュース

パートナーシップ

ベンジンガ・グローバル